Heavy Element Production in Stars

From: Fusioneer (ccryder1947_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/27/05 

Date: 27 Feb 2005 01:20:44 -0800

Friends,

Heavy Dark matter which I have elsewhere name Isaacium because it
occurs in what I have called Isaacium Rings in the cores of stars is
created by large scale flux loop structures that really are just that:
Flux Loops, magnetic or electric depending upon which mode it happens
to be in at the time. Mathematically we describe them as Del X E or
Del X H vector fields. Every flux loop produces its own monolithic
gravitational field the terminus of which is the toroidal axis of said
flux loop. During the Del X H mode (compact mode) of such a structure
which I call an EMT (short for Electromagnetotoroid) the flux loop
creates trillions of tons of mass in the form of neutrons at the
structure's inner equator along the structure's poloidal axis. Those
neutrons accumulate to the gravitational terminus of the loop. Some
decay into protons and because of the gravitational charge separation
effect the electrons from such decays are absolutely excluded from the
gravitational terminus region. Thus we have the formation of a new
state of matter from which electrons are excluded. Because there is no
atomic volume (only nuclear volume) this new form of matter is
extremely dense (nuclear density). I have called this new form of
matter, Isaacium. Isaac means the laughter of disbelief in Hebrew. I
figured that most of the raging pseudoscientists who call themselves
astrophysicists and cosmologists would, at first, laugh in disbelief at
hearing of the existence of Isaacium rings in stars. All other matter
occurs because of the decay of Isaacium when such Isaacium rings are
temporarily displaced from the gravitational terminus of the flux loop
itself. Rapid displacement of a large scale flux loop would cause its
Isaacium ring to go supercritical. The Isaacium could immediately
acquire electrons and then would subsequently begin to differentiate
into a wide variety of atomic species. I can hardly grasp the
intellectual darkness that would suppose that heavy elements are
produced by nuclear fusion, by the collision of light elements that
were heated by the shock wave of a supernova. Such just so stories are
examples of the rampant pseudoscience that dominates modern physics
today. People, you ought to look at the remnants of supernovae. What
do you find? Glowing rings. How do you get an expanding ring of
matter except that you start with one. And you see them emerging from
supernovae all over the cosmos. Get a clue please. Stars don't
produce the bulk of their energy via fusion. That is one of the
biggest pseudoscientific fictions of the age and it dominates thoughts
in astrophysics, astronomy, and cosmology and hasn't a shred of hard
data to substantiate it as a belief. But nevertheless fools will be
fools and they will believe in what they have been told to believe and
they will defend their beliefs to the death because they have nothing
more substantial to fall back on (but their beliefs). Planets have
internal EMTs. Planets go through dipole reversals (mode changes) and
planet's EMTs produce mass. Planets grow. See:

www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/6520/

or see:

www.triplehood.com/triplehood/expa.htm

The scientists who have put up those earth expansion sites haven't had
a mechanism for planetary growth but they certainly have collected
irrefutable data that the Earth has grown 6.3 fold in volume since the
period referred to as the Jurassic. But with a mass generation
mechanism in the core of the Earth the whole foundational premises for
radiometric dating has been invalidated. Too bad. Pseudoscience, no
matter how clever, ought to go away.

Go to http://www.singtech.com to see a graphic of an oscillating flux
loop structure.

Peace to men of good will.