Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate
From: George Dishman (george_at_briar.demon.co.uk)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: glbrad01: "Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused"
- Previous message: glbrad01: "Re: Astronomers: 'Dark' galaxy discovered"
- In reply to: jgreen_at_seol.net.au: "Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate"
- Next in thread: jgreen_at_seol.net.au: "Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate"
- Reply: jgreen_at_seol.net.au: "Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:56:06 -0000
<jgreen@seol.net.au> wrote in message
news:1109461004.939277.271580@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
>>
>> Maxwell provides the conundrum I describe, since light travels at c for
>> all
>> observers, yet light leaves "forward" from an object travelling at c. He
>> seems to be running towards Fizeau next...
>
> Then wasn't Maxwell saying c'=c+v
David said "light travels at c for all observers"
hence c'=c.
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/inquiring/more/light/light_page9.html
> , and thus in direct conflict with AE?
See section 6 of Einstein's original paper:
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/inquiring/more/light/light_page9.html
> How is the increasing length per time (velocity) of these jets measured?
Length isn't too meaningful as the jets are a
continuous flow so there is no clear end to the
jet. Measuring the speed depends on non-uniformity
in the flow by following the progress of 'knots'
of matter. For example:
http://www.stsci.edu/ftp/science/m87/m87.html
and in particular this set of frames:
http://www.stsci.edu/ftp/science/m87/bw3.gif
Or look at the attached radio map here:
http://www.phy.duke.edu/~kolena/superluminalmotion.html
You might also practice your maths by trying
to answer the questions on that page ;-)
> SR believers might claim that the only legitimate measurement would be
> that of a traveller on the jet!
SR provides a set of rules for converting
measurements in one frame into another frame.
Both measurements are "legitimate" in their
respective frames.
> Otherwise, SR is decapitated right
> here, with the obvious and trivial observation that velocity has NOT
> shrunken the moving body!
It has. Someone riding on the jet would measure
a greater distance between the same knots than
an observer at rest wrt the source and viewing
the jet perpendicular to its motion.
George
- Next message: glbrad01: "Re: Inflationary Theory ; I'm confused"
- Previous message: glbrad01: "Re: Astronomers: 'Dark' galaxy discovered"
- In reply to: jgreen_at_seol.net.au: "Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate"
- Next in thread: jgreen_at_seol.net.au: "Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate"
- Reply: jgreen_at_seol.net.au: "Re: Superluminal Quasar Jets : The Beaming "Explanation" Appears Inadequate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|