Re: 2nd Chez Watt - Astronomers: 'Dark' galaxy discovered
From: Troels Forchhammer (Troels_at_ThisIsFake.invalid)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: Abstracts for the 2005 Lunar and Planetary Science Conference are up."
- Previous message: Ulf Torkelsson: "Re: Astronomers: 'Dark' galaxy discovered"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:55:15 GMT
In message <ulCTd.143$M27.4376@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>,
shane <remarcsdNOSPAM@ozemail.com.au> enriched us with:
>
<snip>
> No, and i am in agreeance that the invisible can be detected by other
> means, just not generally by it 'appearing' which in normal usage is
> to do with the visible part of the spectrum.
It is not the object ('the newfound dark galaxy') itself that appears --
it 'appears to be' which has a different meaning that simply 'appears'.
In this case the 'appearance' relates to inferences that appear from the
collected data, presumably to the naked eye (though probably a solid
amount of interpretation is involved as well <G>).
-- Troels Forchhammer Valid e-mail is t.forch(a)email.dk Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true. - Niels Bohr, to a young physicist
- Next message: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: Abstracts for the 2005 Lunar and Planetary Science Conference are up."
- Previous message: Ulf Torkelsson: "Re: Astronomers: 'Dark' galaxy discovered"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
