Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery
bigbomber_at_socal.rr.com
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: dar7yl: "Re: Alien Tentacles on Mars!"
- Previous message: jonathan: "Won't You Please Come to Chicago"
- Maybe in reply to: ktredwell_at_ou.edu: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Next in thread: tholen_at_antispam.ham: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Reply: tholen_at_antispam.ham: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Reply: doktorf: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Feb 2005 23:28:13 -0800
> The classification of Pluto as a planet was probably a mistake
>
> Bob Kolker
I disagree. The way I see it, if it's round and orbits the Sun, it's a
planet! And if that means classifying other objects in the solar
system as planets (like Quaoar), then so be it.
- Next message: dar7yl: "Re: Alien Tentacles on Mars!"
- Previous message: jonathan: "Won't You Please Come to Chicago"
- Maybe in reply to: ktredwell_at_ou.edu: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Next in thread: tholen_at_antispam.ham: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Reply: tholen_at_antispam.ham: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Reply: doktorf: "Re: Likeliness of Pluto discovery"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|