Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
From: George (george_at_wtfiswrongwithyou.com)
Date: 03/08/05
- Next message: George: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Previous message: George: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- In reply to: chosp: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Next in thread: KoOk E. Rabbit: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Reply: KoOk E. Rabbit: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 05:43:56 GMT
"chosp" <chosp@cox.net> wrote in message
news:L04Xd.159664$0u.117816@fed1read04...
>
> "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
> news:422C99AF.C166BA6F@hate.spam.net...
>
>> The Hubble could not tolerate the light intensity even if it had the
>> resolution.
>
> Not true. Hubble has imaged the moon.
> The problem is both the angular resolution of a 98 inch mirror
> and that the moon is moving too fast for Hubble to lock
> on to properly - so some resolution is lost to slight motion blur.
>
It sure has. Here are the images:
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/1999/14/
- Next message: George: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Previous message: George: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- In reply to: chosp: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Next in thread: KoOk E. Rabbit: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Reply: KoOk E. Rabbit: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|