Re: MAILGATE sucks, or at least NSA/MI6 sucks

From: Brad Guth (ieisbradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/11/05 

Date: 10 Mar 2005 21:28:46 -0800

Chadwick Stone© and friends of humanity,
It seems that fools like incest cloned "DrPostman' are reborn each and
every day, and I seriously believe that the real-fool joke has actually
been upon you and myself. Sorry about this following wall-of-words
rant, as it certainly isn't all that succinct, more like aggravated
along by the malware offered by our NSA/MI6 spooks attempting to damage
my PC as well as my soul.

It seems that the NASA 'Skull and Bones' uplink.space.com forum has
been chatting up storms about methods of terraforming Venus into
becoming more Earth like. I can only assume that represents
accommodating their mad warlord like our very own GW Bush that has been
running amuck. It seems they've been doing this because they don't know
and/or realize squat about Venus, much less comprehend physics-101, but
rather because they can continue snookering humanity for sport at the
demise of whomever gets in their way.

NASA's spin and damage-control 'uplink.space.com' has been discussing
of all things a 'Lunar Space Elevator' as though I don't exist, and not
that I invented a damn thing about such a nifty elevator, as many good
folks have apparently proposed such as of a good decade before my
efforts and, in spite of the mainstream opposition, I've eventually
learned of such efforts being quite nicely flushed into one of those
spendy space-toilets, just like the incest cloned borgs have done with
each and every one of my suggestions.

Oddly, these same contributors of such topics having excluded my
discovery of what's on Venus and of all of my original LSE input were
the very same folks that had been stalking and bashing at my every
word, to the point of absolute banishment from the likes of their
incest cloned 'uplink.space.com' forum that sucks.

Universe Today - Space Elevator? Build it on the Moon First
LiftWatch.org: Space Elevator News
Space elevator - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[PDF] IAC-04-IAA.3.8.3.07 THE LUNAR SPACE ELEVATOR
Slashdot | Lunar Space Elevator Instead?
washingtonpost.com: NASA Nurtures Inventors to Produce Space ...

These are just the first few examples offered by the sort of folks
avoiding constructive though honest input, yet being their typical
two-faced if not three-faced or rather skewed multitasking ***-crack
bigoted selves about promoting whatever topics on the subject of their
version of LSE and of whatever else their resident warlord desires
credit for. Talk about political *** suck-ups, and the list actually
goes on and on, of folks discussing the pro/con issues of whatever such
a Lunar Space Elevator(LSE) represents. Of course, not one of these
groups of individual incest cloned fools offers us a working clue as to
how the heck we'd so much as go about accomplishing our first and all
essential AI/robotic lander and thereby surface capable probe, much
less of accommodating anything manned. For God's freaking sake, they
haven't even allowed the 10 year old LUNAR-A mission to fly.

Within their latest ruse, supposedly forking out another $75,000 of our
hard earned dollars, it seems there's nothing to come from the likes of
'Star,Inc.' that's going to amount to anything more than the usual
mainstream status quo, of artistic dog-wagging infomercial spin,
disinformation-R-us and eventually pumping that into funding yet
another spendy NOVA production class of NASA infomercial, as ***
saving hype that'll only lead to further computer generated and
animated productions as for televised models of whatever's necessary in
order to appease their fully snookered and thereby dumbfounded public.

Real LSE-CM/ISS R&D is more likely starting off at $100,000 per day and
perhaps rounding off at a steady million bucks/euros per day, then the
actual construction and deployment start-up phase taking at least 10
million initially per day and finally rounding off at perhaps 100
million hard earned bucks/euros per day before the LSE-CM/ISS is
eventually up and running within the following decade. However, the
payback for astronomy, science and humanity, not to mention the very
salvation of the environment of mother Earth and thereby saving
humanity upon Earth is worth at least 10 fold.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A41453-2005Jan1?language=printer
"Jerome Pearson, an engineer in Mount Pleasant, S.C., shows rendering
of the lunar space elevator for which he received a $75,000 grant from
NASA. (Wade Spees For The Washington Post)"
www.star-tech-inc.com/spaceelevator.html

Even the above 'Jerome Pearson' contribution is simply providing us
another dog-wagging rusemaster effort, as per $75,000 would have been
an impressive personal kick-start for the visual/artistic conception
phase of my LSE-CM/ISS, but otherwise not an actual week worth of
for-real engineering. The LSE as compared to their previous ESE fiasco
(that we've funded initially at $500,000) is so much bigger and of so
much more importance than even several ESEs, as in the LSE having to do
with the efficient terraforming of the moon as well as per the export
of energy and mineral resources to Earth, not to mention providing
final construction and outfitting (including necessary fuel) of other
missions badly in need of such a nifty pitstop of what a depot/gateway
to other worlds represents, plus that of accommodating and empowering
the very best of star-wars and of effectively dealing with NEOs, as
such the LSE-CM/ISS is just thousands of fold physically bigger and
thereby vastly more impressive than anything ESE, far more that can be
summed up within whatever artistic and animation likes of another
mainstream puppet artist/engineer like 'Jerome Pearson' is capable of
providing with merely $75,000. As that's less worth than having to
develop a new member for 'The Simpson's'.

I'm suggesting at minimum 500 billion, and most likely surpassing a
trillion bucks will be what's actually necessary in order to enable the
first operational phase of the LSE-CM/ISS. Of course just the export of
He3 will soon pay that amount back, and then some, year after year.
Thus the overall payback could end up being 100:1, and that's after
recovering all of the R&D, LSE expansion and operational overhead taken
into consideration. Thus even affording a 10 trillion dollar investment
is easily worth it when there's at least another trillion dollar profit
as payback per year, and only more valuable payback as the rest of
Earth catches up to our energy sucking level of consumption which will
have by then become pollution free via solar/sterling and He3/fusion
reactors. Is that absolutely good news or what?

I want you to take a little further notice as to how they've all
avoided the raw fact of the matter, that with such a tethered LSE is
offering the one and only viable method of getting instruments and/or
folks safely to/from the lunar surface a modestly risky lunar nighttime
as for any EVA fully moon-suited human environment. Notice how none of
their papers or forum topics and subsequent arguments so much as
mentions the bloody cold-war FACTS, that according to the
hard-scientific truth we've never actually walked upon the moon, nor
has a Russian AI/robotic 4D fly-by-rocket effort so much as managed a
soft landing upon any such place without atmosphere.

Not that our moon couldn't eventually become terraformed into
sustaining an atmosphere of possibly 0.17 bar, although that's still
offering a highly TBI environment (especially by solar scorching day)
as 0.17 bar simply is not even all that physically protective from
whatever nasty flak is in the way or otherwise incoming via gravity,
thus underground lunar habitats within hollow rilles and/or within
geode pockets of sufficient wall-thickness (100+ meters should suffice
but, there's ample proof-positive of the more the better once you've
understood the implications of our ongoing 'DEEP IMPACT' mission) will
have to remain the sanctuary norm (at least until lunar nighttime), and
otherwise safely accommodated within the tethered LSE-CM/ISS abode of
1e6 m3 that's surrounding that internal complex and yourself with at
least 50t/m2 worth of physical shield, and actually a depth of 100t/m2
isn't unwarranted nor all that insurmountable to achieve, as it's not
on behalf of the cosmic and solar radiation nor even that derived from
the horrific secondary recoil X-Ray and cosmic Gamma-Ray recoil dosage
off the raw solar illuminated moon that'll kill off your DNA/RNA, at
least not nearly as much as per running yourself into whatever at
30+km/s is going to be capable of penetrating a fair amount of basalt
and subsequently terminating all but the most substantially shielded
folks, such as those within the CM/ISS sphere that may have to be
provided with safety zones of 100 meters worth and thereby better than
300t/m2 in order to survive the nasty gauntlet that's not buffered by
any atmosphere, thereby placing entirely new meaning as to the NEO
importance of even fairly small items that would be meaningless to
those of us upon Earth.

I have a new and improved composite of basalt fiber and 'JB Weld' that
should greatly improve upon the impact resistance, although you can't
hardly beat sheer mass, especially of the sort of mass that's easily
obtainable from the moon itself.

Wagging The Dogs;
Basically this latest resident warlord suck-up maneuver by NASA is
called LLPOF, as in continuing those mutually perpetrated cold-war(s)
and space-race(s) for sport and for profit, not to mention involuntary
population control of mostly Islamic and Muslim folks, and then as to
the mutual pillaging and subsequent pollution of mother Earth, whereas
hundreds of thousands and actually millions of folks have had to die
off before their time, initially due to what mostly our American bogus
cold-war had been accomplishing against the USSR and Russia of today.
You simply can not invest another trillion upon trillion perpetrating
throughout decades of such a phony baloney cold-war and even more so
phony moon-space-race without having diverted those talents and funds
away from Earth science and thereby away from the everyday needs of
humanity.

Now, lo and behold, instead of our having a mere couple of mad cold-war
perpetrating warlords running Earth amuck and nearly into WW-III, it
seems we have created dozens of such absolute bastards taking
whatever's within reach, plus those having supposedly legitimate
incomes derived from the likes of our now artificially inflated oil
prices making it all the more possible for those up and coming warlords
to buy from just about anyone that'll sell whatever (such as smart
stingers capable of downing a 747 at better than 15,000' and those
thoughtfully humanitarian landmines from us), and simultaneously
pricing and/or excluding those very same energy products entirely out
of reach of the havenot developing nations, of which our upper most
0.1% of humanity considers the entire lower 99.9% as 'scum of the
Earth', thus it has become another win-win for the eventual demise of
humanity at the profit for the upper most 0.1% that rule this Earth
while at the demise of the lower 99.9% that apparently aren't worth
squat.

Are we good at this doom and gloom 'winner take all' game or what? Or,
was all of this supposed to be a joke?

Basically, our government has been (double duh) corrupt and otherwise
just good old dishonest liars of the worst possible LLPOF status quo
you can possibly think of, thereby of despicable bastards and bitches
from absolute hell, along with the loyal help of their borg minions
from hell. As such, I believe we've become worse off than anything
Hitler had in mind, and I'm not all that certain that the likes of
Osama bin Laden or even that of Saddam couldn't possibly be worse off
than having to deal with the sorts of intellectual ***-crack
flatulence of our incest cloned cold-war minions for hire. Perhaps
instead of going to all the trouble of obtaining lunar He3, we should
just stuff a hose up each of their butts and thereby efficiently run
our power generating plants on their intellectual gas.

Basic township that's situated upon Venus:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Basic LSE (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS topics:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm