Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
From: Brad Guth (ieisbradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: ***-for-brains-response-team: "Re: Is Kimberly Barnard A Psychologist?"
- Previous message: ***-for-brains-response-team: "Re: Is Kimberly Barnard A Psychologist?"
- In reply to: Bunn E. Rabbit: "Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Next in thread: Art Deco: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Reply: Art Deco: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Reply: ++The Commentator++: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Mar 2005 16:45:05 -0800
This is actually intended for the likes of 'tj Frazir' and other
friends of humanity,
Stop wasting your talents and whatever resources on the likes of
Lord/wizard 'bz', as for this incest cloned borg has disclosed upon a
hidden agenda and ulterior motives that'll eat you alive.
No matter's what you've started or merely contributed, the likes of
'bz' will only string you along so far, that is before they start in
with their collectived approved and provided VX gas that's intended to
put a stop and/or at least derail whatever your topic or intent of any
given topic. Essentially 'bz' sucks whenever it gets down to actually
contributing anything that's even coming close to his 'nondisclosure'
policy that actually lethal with respect to his sorry *** should
something slip out
As you already know better than most, some folks (actually a great
many) have a truly sickening and perverted form of humor, as they'll
suggest and/or specify upon what's actually public knowledge as from
those that already know all there is to know, as though their
need-to-know methods of helping a given topic is by way of sharing so
damn little that's usually focused upon defending whatever's their
position, and if need be by way of 'evidence exclusions', rather than
offering a gram towards exployting upon the possiblies of whatever
others are having to offer, and this tactic especially within the
highly subjective realm of observationology.
Keeping in mind that folks like 'bz' seldom originate a topic but
seemingly arrive like ETs coming out of nowhere with their all-knowing
vaporware, as focused onto the given topic scene after the fact and
then seldom if ever contribute squat that doesn't fully comply with
their NASA/Apollo approved bible of 'so what's the difference' and of
their supposed 'high standards and accountability' that subsequently
needs that nifty amendment of 'up yours', especially applied whevever
there's without a stitch of hard-science that you're bring thought of
as having WMD. Sorry folks, but that sucks ripe and big time,
especially when there are so many dead and otherwise dying bodies of
friends and perfectly innocent folks surrounding the one and only
smoking gun as well as their bloody feet.
Unlike what Lord/wizard 'bz' has suggested, I'm certainly not the one
that's trying to change the laws of physics to suit anything, just
trying to apply them without their usual social/political conditions
that so happen to suit their mainstream status quo of whatever our
perpetrated cold-war(s) and of so much other collateral damage and
strife that so happens to include the ongoing carnage of the innocent,
as such having to offer their side of a given argument merrit that's
clearly against humanity is absolutely 'Hitler' sick, though apparently
of which the likes of 'bz' sees absolutely nothing whatsoever improper
nor the least bit worth a gram of remorse about our past, present nor
future that's become beyond sucking for those that are either dead or
about to die for no apparent good reason. As it's just another 'bz'
status quo of business as usual all the way into the intellectual
space-toilet of life as seen fit by those directly and indirectly (like
'bz') having remained as resident whatever administration supportive
and thereby more than willing to continue the great ruse/sting of the
century without a stitch of hard-science, much less remorse.
That puts the likes of 'bz' way past the realm of just being immorally
sick to the soul.
Now it seems the likes of Lord/wizard 'bz' is (without ever once
asking) proclaiming without ever putting up or even so much as
suggesting squat of their own image interpretation as proof on their
side of the argument, that I don't have a freaking clue as to
interpreting a hard-science worth upon whatever an 8-bit and 12
looks/pixel radar image that was obtained at roughly 43° as for
accomplishing a damn near 3D look-see at what's most likely artificial
and/or even as to contemplating as to whatever's perfectly natural but
extremely interesting about Venus. This two-faced nutbag discredits
whatever and whomever suits a perverted criteria of snookering thy
humanity. Well damn, the only village idiot 'fool on the hill' that's
being snookered this time around isn't me, and I certainly hope 'tj
Frazir' is not falling for any of his certified crapolla either.
As far as I can tell, the only actual flames coming out of this forum
that sucks are those being fueled along by the 'bz' intellectual
flatulence that'll accomplish whatever it takes to disqualify every
other honest soul upon Earth, and if that's something unacceptable for
myself to be sharing and stating, then so be it. This would not be the
first bridge that I've burned and, it probably will not be my last.
-
This closing part is being contributed for the ongoing benefit of
others (news media and general topic newcomers), and not that it
matters to those without a stitch of remorse outside of whatever
appeases their NASA/Apollo cold-war or bust God, as in spite of their
flak having the intent as to kill-off my PC if not myself, within my
spare dyslexic time I've slightly polished on my external 'gv-topics'
page, and I'm working on other pages as soon to be improved. As I learn
more that can be independently supported by sufficient hard-science,
I'll share that knowledge, which will likely include revisions and
retractions of what I've offered thus far. Unfortunately, since I'm
unfunded and on the usual 'need-to-know' bases with regard to anything
that might rock a mainstream boat, this process is going to take many
thousands of my lose cannon shots before the truth and nothing but the
truth is going be told. And I bet you thought the likes of big and
fully loaded aircraft smashing into fully occupied tall buildings was
as bad as it gets; think again.
Basic township that's situated upon Venus:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Basic LSE (Lunar Space Elevator):
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Other available topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
- Next message: ***-for-brains-response-team: "Re: Is Kimberly Barnard A Psychologist?"
- Previous message: ***-for-brains-response-team: "Re: Is Kimberly Barnard A Psychologist?"
- In reply to: Bunn E. Rabbit: "Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Next in thread: Art Deco: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Reply: Art Deco: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Reply: Brad Guth: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Reply: ++The Commentator++: "Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]