observable Cosmic mass 10^40 hydrogen atoms? Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Action Principle using Atom Totality theory

From: Archimedes Plutonium (a_plutonium_at_iw.net)
Date: 03/27/05 

Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:37:05 -0600

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:07:56 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

>
> The Atom Totality theory sees gravity as that the Sun and Earth masses
> are pieces of the 94th electron and are acted on by the 94 protons in
> the nucleus of 231Pu. That action creates a highly bent space around the
> Sun moreso than around Earth and so the trajectory of Earth is to
> revolve around the Sun.
>
> So gravity, in an AtomTotality is the Coulomb force on a Cosmic scale.
>
> Where Newton was wrong is that mass does not attract mass to make
> gravity, it is the fact that all mass we see in the Universe is the mass
> of the electrons of 231Pu which is pulled Coulombically by the protons
> of 231Pu.
>
> Where Einstein went wrong was that he thought mass bends space. Mass
> itself does not have that capability. What bends space is the Coulomb
> force of the 94 Cosmic protons. That is why the mathematical form of
> gravity is identical to the Coulomb force law because they are one and
> the same-- a Coulomb force.

That implies the mass of the Observable Cosmos is 10^40 protons where the
number is got from the fact that gravity is 10^40 weaker than Coulomb
force. It is a precise number though and not an estimate. It is as precise
as we can measure the difference in strength between gravity and coulomb.

But I am not sure as to whether it is the mass of just the 5f6 as the
observable Universe or whether it is the mass of the entire 94 electron
space of 231Pu. I am not quite sure how to envision 94 protons
coulombically holding together 94 electrons. Anyone have a quantum insight
on how a plutonium atom of its 94 protons holds together its 94 electrons.
If I can get an insight to that question would answer whether the entire
Cosmos, not just our observable part, of the electron space holds a mass of
10^40 protons, or hydrogen atoms.

Question: do we have some estimate from other parts of physics as to the
mass of the total universe? And is it 10^40 hydrogen atoms?

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Relevant Pages

  • Re: New dimensions?
    ... I've conected the math between mass gained and mass moved. ... YOUR sorry ass wount disscuss gravity because you don't know shit. ... The center of evry atom is where its parts fall too. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Why should we fear the MATRIX?
    ... Tell us all Uncle Dumbass how gravity moves anything. ... Up is a gain in mass. ... The center of evry atom is where its parts fall too. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Thirteen Spades
    ... Not the the fact gravity is an energy slope. ... Not just the fact Up is a gain in mass. ... Evry atom in the field has the same proportion of mass change. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • observable Cosmic mass 10^40 hydrogen atoms? Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Ac
    ... > So gravity, in an AtomTotality is the Coulomb force on a Cosmic scale. ... > Where Newton was wrong is that mass does not attract mass to make ... What bends space is the Coulomb ... on how a plutonium atom of its 94 protons holds together its 94 electrons. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: "Einsteins Unfortunate Legacy #2"
    ... revealed to be a force resulting from the release of mass energy due to ... However, as to the assertion re gravity quoted above, I would like to ... work titled "The Quantum as a Physical Entity". ... the energy of expansion and contraction ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)