Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Action Principle using Atom Totality theory
From: vonroach (hadrainc_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 03/27/05
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Action Principle using Atom Totality theory"
- Previous message: tholen_at_antispam.ham: "Re: kookdancers digest"
- In reply to: Quantum Mirror: "Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Action Principle using Atom Totality theory"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Action Principle using Atom Totality theory"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Action Principle using Atom Totality theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:31:36 GMT
On 27 Mar 2005 01:56:35 -0800, "Quantum Mirror" <junebug@pgrb.com>
wrote:
>Ha Ha Ha Hee Hee lol, Do you have your dunce cap on? Maybe it could be
>the cells of your brain are galaxies. Or the hairs on my ass. I took a
>dump last week and it kind of curled in the shape of a galaxy. Maybe
>we live in a world of ***!
We can conclude that you do from your rhetoric.
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Action Principle using Atom Totality theory"
- Previous message: tholen_at_antispam.ham: "Re: kookdancers digest"
- In reply to: Quantum Mirror: "Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Action Principle using Atom Totality theory"
- Next in thread: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Action Principle using Atom Totality theory"
- Reply: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: For the first time: an explanation of the Least Action Principle using Atom Totality theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
