Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- From: jgreen@xxxxxxxxxxx (Jim Greenfield)
- Date: 3 Apr 2005 16:09:27 -0700
Joseph Lazio <jlazio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:<llbr8wvyix.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
> Jim Greenfield wrote:
> > Jonathan Silverlight <jsilverlight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote in message news:<bi4WbdMYiHTCFwae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
> >
> >> In message <llll83a8e8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Lazio
> >> <jlazio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>
> >>>> Astronomers spot the faintest galaxy ever seen--orbiting the
> >>>> Milky Way.
>
> >>> Here's the abstract from the discovery paper,
> >>> <URL:http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0503552>:
>
> >> I get a rough figure of +18, spread over a field
> >> about 1/4 degree across. I have no idea why my post triggered an
> >> argument about the Big Bang!
>
> > Sorry :-( Just me pointing out once again, glaring contradictions
> > in BBT and observation.
>
> Actually, this observation actually supports some cold dark matter
> models. There's been an on-going discrepancy between what various
> models for structure formation predict and what is observed: Various
> computer simulations of galaxy formation predict that a large galaxy
> like the Milky Way should have many more satellite galaxies than are
> observed. This discovery helps reduce, but only slightly, the
> discrepancy.
Perhaps I am inadvertantly a "supporter" of 'dark matter', if, as I
suggest, photons lose their kinetic energy by gravitational
retardation of their motion after emission, or through interaction
with other entities. This opens the possibility (make that
probability) that the same (infinite) amount of mass / energy has
ALWAYS been, and that galaxies form, evolve, and decay eternally.
Thus galaxies of all ages exist in a roughly homogenous universe, and
it looks like their life expectancy is about 10 - 12 Ga, IFf current
aging criteria are correct.
For the education of BF: The MW revolves about 1/200m years. If it is
10Ga, now you see how only 50 revs have occurred. I find it highly
unlikely that it has achieved its degree of diversity and
sophistication given that scenario. Either the aging criteria or the
observations which lead to the 200 m are likely flawed. How did the
orbiting galaxy form and obtain an orbit around mW in such a "short"
time??
As for the distant "young" galaxies, do you think that they have
performed only 5 revs?
Jim G
c'=c+v
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- References:
- Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- From: Joseph Lazio
- Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- From: Jonathan Silverlight
- Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- From: Jim Greenfield
- Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- From: Joseph Lazio
- Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- Prev by Date: Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- Next by Date: Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- Previous by thread: Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- Next by thread: Re: BREAKING NEWS: The Galaxy's newest satellite
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|