Re: antigravity/electrogravity

Dear Shaun Moss:

"Shaun Moss" <s3140881@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d3lcb2$237t$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi
>
> I would like to hear anyone's ideas about these
> subjects. Why is it that it seems only a few
> people around the world are researching them,

Because there is no science there yet. So ony those that feel
they can go into a very large area, in the dark, fire a shot from
a peashooter, and down the gazelle of "antigravity", do so.

> and why is it
> mostly hobbyists and independent inventors.

Because the predictive abilities of a science aren't there to say
"now do this", "place this here", "apply this much", and "stay
out of here".

> Is it supressed tech?

No. What has been tried so far is based on what already is known
not to work, or work only over a limited range.

> Surely
> antigravity would be the most desirable tech
> we could possibly develop. Why is not every
> major university studying this?

What do you think is at the heart of the *intense* study of GR
and quantum gravity? *Everyone* wants it.

> The Biefeld-Brown effect has been
> known about since the 20s - how is it
> possible that we don't have flying cars
> yet?

You've never been on the freeway in California, I see.

David A. Smith


.