Re: kookdancers digest

To see which posters are so-called "kookdancers", simply watch
which ones post a response and add a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups
to the distribution. Another good indicator is to note which of
those responders follow a person to one or more of those irrelevant
newsgroups and engage in their antagonism there. Also look for
those that are proud of the number of disruptive postings they make
to the newsgroups or who pontificate about the multiple newsgroups
being relevant. Those who waste their time on meaningless "kook"
polls also fall into the category. Another sign are those who
hypocritically complain about the same "tripe" being posted over and
over while posting the same "tripe" over and over, who talk of
cowardice and yet post with a fake name, and who tell others to shut
up but won't shut up themselves.

===========================================================================

Art Deco writes:

1918> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,ne.weather,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1918> Indeed, one little slip or loss of concentration can cause permanent
1918> problems, Bruce.

1919> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell

1919> When in Rome, Bruce, don't order French food.

1920> Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,soc.culture.israel

1920> Are you a high plains drifter, Bruce?

1921> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

1921> The pipes leading into the digestor must be enormous, Bruce.

1922> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

1922> I think he's addicted to the attention, Bruce.

1923> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

1923> I just wish he would change his digestor screed every once in a while,
1923> the same old same old day after day is quite boring. But what should I
1923> expect from a dork, Bruce.

1923> They are, Bruce.

1924> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

1924> It is always the evil pests and antagonists who are the problem, Bruce,
1924> they do not conform to the kookdancers images of what usenet should be.

1925> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

1925> Coward of the Month, Kook of the Month, Classic "Gigi" Tholenator(tm)
1925> <tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> tholed:

1925> Classic lack of specificity.

1925> Classic inconsistency.

1925> Irrelevant.

1925> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
1925> argument.

1925> Classic pontification.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
1925> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

1925> Irrelevant.

1925> Classic evasion of the point.

1925> Classic inappropriate analogy.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
1925> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

1925> Classic erroneous presupposition.

1925> You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

1925> Classic failure to comprehend the point.

1925> Irrelevant.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

1925> Classic erroneous presupposition.

1925> Classic lack of specificity.

1925> Classic failure to comprehend the point.

1925> Classic failure to comprehend the point.

1925> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
1925> argument.

1925> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

1925> Illogical.

1925> Classic pontification.

1925> Classic inconsistency.

1925> Classic evasion of the point.

1925> Note: no response. No surprise, really.

1925> Note: no response. No surprise, really.

1925> Non sequitur.

1925> Classic erroneous presupposition.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
1925> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

1925> Ambiguous.

1925> Classic failure to comprehend the point.

1925> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
1925> argument.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

1925> Classic inconsistency.

1925> Non sequitur.

1925> Classic erroneous presupposition.

1925> Classic erroneous presupposition.

1925> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

1925> Classic erroneous presupposition.

1925> Ambiguous.

1925> Classic lack of specificity.

1925> Classic lack of specificity.

1925> Classic inconsistency.

1925> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
1925> argument.

1925> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

1925> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

1925> Liar.

1925> Classic pontification.

1925> Classic pontification.

1925> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

1925> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
1925> argument.

1925> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
1925> argument.

1925> Classic inappropriate analogy.

1925> Classic pontification.

1925> How ironic.

1925> Classic evasion of the point.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

1925> Illogical.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

1925> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

1925> You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
1925> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

1925> You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

1925> You're erroneously presupposing that it's a fact.

1925> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
1925> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

1926> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1926> All the witnesses agree, Bruce.

1926> He just keeps turning the crank, Bruce.

1926> And may the alleged Joe Malloy continue to twist Classic
1926> Tholenator(tm)'s panties into a large knot, Bruce.

1927> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1927> This makes good sense, Bruce.

1928> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1928> After all these years, Clueless Tholenator(tm) still doesn't grasp the
1928> concept of people boosting their digestor numbers with The Mighty Poast
1928> Count for no other reasons other than simple amusement.

1929> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1929> Tholenator(tm) nonlinearity is evident to all observers, Bruce.

1929> Irrational, isn't it?

1930> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1930> This was more than 12 years ago in a long-dead alt.* group, Bruce.

1931> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1931> I don't think it will help any, Bruce.

1931> Check out "G=EMC^2 Glazier" in alt.astronomy for a great example of a
1931> webbie, Bruce.

1931> I doubt he can catch the Wollkook AKA Edmond Wollmann, Bruce, who has
1931> around *thirty* at last count.

1932> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical,sci.astro,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

1932> Coward of the Month, Kook of the Month, Classic "Gigi" Tholenator(tm)
1932> <tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> tholed:


1932> Your repetitive and off-topic "digests" are pretty lame, Classic
1932> Tholenator(tm).

1932> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
1932> argument.

1932> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

1932> Classic lack of specificity.

1933> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical

1933> Through quartz crystals, Bruce.

1933> No surprise really, Bruce.

1934> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

1934> Coward of the Month, Kook of the Month, Classic "Gigi" Tholenator(tm)
1934> <tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> tholed:

1934> As predicted:

1934> Why should I bother to explain it to you, Gigi, when:

1934> a) You can't understand it
1934> b) You won't reply to it
1934> c) You'll sneck the context like the coward you are
1934> d) You'll just dump it into the Holy Digestor

1934> Continue kookdancing, Gigi.

1934> Classic lack of specificity.

1934> Classic lack of specificity.

1934> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
1934> argument.

1934> How ironic.

1934> Liar.

1934> Classic erroneous presupposition.

1934> Liar.

1934> Classic evasion of the point.

1934> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
1934> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

1934> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
1934> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

1934> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

1934> Irrelevant.

1934> How many times have you posted the word "classic" over the last fifteen
1934> years, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

1934> Now, what do your repetitive and off-topic "digests" have to do with
1934> classical music, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

1934> What does this have to do with classical music, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

1934> What does this have to do with classical music, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

1934> Shut up, Classic Tholenator(tm).

1935> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,sci.astro,rec.music.classical,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fucknozzles

1935> Coward of the Month, Kook of the Month, Classic "Gigi" Tholenator(tm)
1935> <tholen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> tholed:

1935> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
1935> argument.

1935> Classic inconsistency.

1935> Ambiguous.

1935> Non sequitur.

1935> Classic evasion of the point.


1935> As predicted:

1935> Why should I bother to explain it to you, Gigi, when:

1935> a) You can't understand it
1935> b) You won't reply to it
1935> c) You'll sneck the context like the coward you are
1935> d) You'll just dump it into the Holy Digestor

1935> Continue kookdancing, Gigi.

1935> Classic lack of specificity.

1935> Classic lack of specificity.

1935> Classic invective, as expected from someone who lacks a logical
1935> argument.

1935> How ironic.

1935> Liar.

1935> Classic erroneous presupposition.

1935> Liar.

1935> Classic evasion of the point.

1935> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
1935> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

1935> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
1935> expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.

1935> You're erroneously presupposing that you are correct.

1935> Irrelevant.

1935> How many times have you posted the word "classic" over the last fifteen
1935> years, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

1935> Now, what do your repetitive and off-topic "digests" have to do with
1935> astronomy or OS/2, Classic Tholenator(tm)?

1935> What does this have to do with astronomy or OS/2, Classic
1935> Tholenator(tm)?

1935> What does this have to do with astronomy or OS/2, Classic
1935> Tholenator(tm)?

1935> Shut up, Classic Tholenator(tm).

1936> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1936> My bad, sorry! What was I thinking?!?

===========================================================================

Michael Baldwin Bruce writes:

1673> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1673> I've noticed, Bruce.

1673> Its like fiber for his diet, Bruce. But he's still full of ***.

1673> Live long and prosper, Bruce.

1674> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1674> If she's like a dog, we do it on the paper, Bruce.
1674> If she's like a cat, we use kitty litter.

1675> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1675> *burp!!*

1676> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1676> A truer word was never spoken, Bruce. He's like a cat having a hissy
1676> fit - claws out, back up, hair on end, tail up and tiny little fangs
1676> bared. Naturally, his bark is worse than his bite. More like a yapping
1676> chihuahua than anything else.

1676> Bruce the hypocrite AKA KotM Tholen's certainly is, Bruce.

1677> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1677> We might need Klingon pain sticks too, Bruce.

1677> Is he still around or has he morphed, bruce?

1678> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,ne.weather,rec.photo.digital,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1678> Sheila AKA Alexa needs an upgrade from the aliens, Bruce.

1678> There's always WebTV, Bruce. Seems worse than RoadRunner, though.

1678> He'll have a trophy case full of awards by then, Bruce.

1679> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

1679> I'm sure we can help him there, Bruce.

1680> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

1680> You're right about him being a quack, Bruce. He also waddles like a
1680> dork on account of his tutu.

1680> Kookdancers are like that, Bruce.

1681> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

1681> What else is new, Bruce? These kookdancers are like that. Always in
1681> denial.

1682> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell

1682> As those damn Frenchies say, the more things change the more they
1682> don't, Bruce.

1683> He was out looking up at Uranus again, Bruce.

1683> The Dutch wouldn't let him in the country, Bruce.

1684> Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college,rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks

1684> His mouth is as big as his fat head and permanently open from all the
1684> digesting, Bruce. Disgusting, isn't he?

1685> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,ne.weather,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1685> You have to be real careful when keeping an eye on these kooks, Bruce.

1686> Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,soc.culture.israel

1686> There's also the good, the bad, and the ugly, Bruce. Not to mention the
1686> magnificent seven.

.

Quantcast