Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: John C. Polasek <jpolasek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 13:57:35 GMT
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:08:02 +0100, "George Dishman"
<george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"John C. Polasek" <jpolasek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:oe58b198em8sg8bflftva1ner1rh9kpk23@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Thanks for bringing it to my attention, George. I accidentally
>> referenced paper #9, but it should be OK now. Paper #4 has to do with
>> Pioneer 10.
>
>OK, I have it now. There are some obvious problems
>without getting into the detail yet. The first you
>point out yourself: the effect of a large distant
>mass would apply to all the bodies in the solar
>system hence we would not detect anything. In fact
>this is currently happening both because the Milky
>Way galaxy is bound in the Local Group. You might
>also find it interesting to look up the "Great
>Attractor":
>
> http://cow.physics.wisc.edu/~ogelman/guide/gr8a/
>
>The second problem is that both Pioneer 10 and 11
>are attracted towards the Sun, but they are on
>opposite sides of the Solar System. Your large mass
>would need to be in two places at once.
>
>> Incidentally I emailed John Anderson to take a look, but he did not
>> respond.
>
>The first point above is of course basic Newtonian
>physics so failing to appreciate that really kills
>your credibility. You can hardly expect anyone to
>take you seriously.
>
>The second point is made in their published paper so
>it looks as though you haven't even bothered to study
>it before leaping in. There's a lot in the document
>and sometimes these points only get a brief mention.
>
>best regards
>George
>
Let's not be so hasty. You have obviously not had time to study the
theory of Dual Space, not in 28 minutes! DS has very far reaching
consequences and is not wedded to the Minkowsky 4-space.
The distance between our universe and its image in Dual Space M_p is
in the 4th dimension of TIME. Our 3d universe speeds along the 4th
dimension of time. This business of "toward the Sun" has nothing to do
with it.
Take a look at paper #2 that explains how gravity works, and how
relativity is vastly simpler with my methods.
I'm not just picking away at what is the current lore, I go to the
bottom. I'd be glad to send you a book if you would take the trouble
to study it.
John Polasek
http://www.dualspace.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- References:
- Pioneer Anomoly
- From: Tom Kirke
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: Jonathan Silverlight
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: George Dishman
- Pioneer Anomoly
- Prev by Date: Re: Interactive Discussion Forum on Sunsigns and Astrology
- Next by Date: Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- Previous by thread: Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- Next by thread: Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|