Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: John C. Polasek <jpolasek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:52:56 GMT
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:38:02 +0100, Jonathan Silverlight
<jsilverlight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>In message <24ejb1hp7qigjj6n9uall317i7gc8amngi@xxxxxxx>, John C. Polasek
><jpolasek@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
>
>>More correctly, it's that both craft seem to lose velocity in time
>>along their velocity line, regardless of direction. Your version
>>implies that the sun has something to do with it which is not a
>>"given".
I should have said line of sight; Doppler normal to LOS is zero is it
not?
>"Velocity line"? Why not say speed if it's "regardless of direction"?
>Velocity doesn't just have more syllables, it has the added meaning of
>direction. It's a vector. And the sun has everything to do with it - the
>Pioneers are being decelerated by the Sun's gravity and by something
>else.
I think it's that "something else" that is very likely not affiliated
with the sun.
>The measured deceleration is toward the Sun - strictly, line of
>sight to the Earth but the two cannot be distinguished. Motion at right
>angles to line of sight is apparently not as well known, which may
>provide food for thought.
>
>>
>>As to the planet neutrality, I am harboring the idea that the
>>satellite is a "Nova" launched by man from Earth and thus might act
>>differently from the solar system which was initially launched at
>>creation 11 Byrs ago.
>
>More nonsense - and this time it wouldn't even make a Star Trek script.
>BTW, the accepted figure is now 13.7 billion for the universe, 4.5
>billion for the solar system.
Yes I'm aware of that but I used Pioneer's Ap to get 10.7byrs in
analyzing Pioneer 10.
If as is possible,
Ap = H*c = 8.74e-10 mss
then H = 2.9e-18/second,
and if T = 1/H,
then T = 10.87e9 yrs
Just what is the basis for 13.7 byr?
>>Bear in mind, we are not sending 2-way signals
>>to the moon or mars and studying their possible Doppler drifts, and
>>that is all we have to study withr the Pioneer.
>
>Actually we are. If you read Anderson et al. "Study of the anomalous
>acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11" you will find that Viking data exists
>and rules out a "Pioneer effect" for Mars.
I have half read the paper again and I saw the statement that when P10
got the signal it amplified it and re scaled it and retransmitted it.
I find that hard to believe, when it seems so much cleaner to trigger
a local oscillator and get a clean primary signal back to earth. I
believe it makes a big difference.
I am continuing to investigate.
John Polasek
http://www.dualspace.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- References:
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- From: Jonathan Silverlight
- Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- Prev by Date: Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- Next by Date: Re: Galaxy cluster at z=1.4 challenges BBT
- Previous by thread: Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- Next by thread: Re: Pioneer Anomoly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|