Re: Big-Bang Theory Disproved
- From: jacob navia <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:44:54 +0200
In Fo wrote:
http://community.webtv.net/hotmail.com/prime137/BigBangDisproved
Prime
More information about this galaxy HUDF-JD2:
1) DIRECT EVIDENCE FOR AN EARLY REIONIZATION OF THE UNIVERSE? http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0509/0509605.pdf
2) NASA Finds 'Big Baby' Galaxies in Newborn Universe Spitzer space telescope press release: http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2005-19/release.shtml
3) Space Daily: Mature Galaxy Found In Early Universe Eight Times More Massive Than Milky Way. http://www.spacedaily.com/news/stellar-chemistry-05ze.html
4) Evidence for a Massive Post-Starburst Galaxy at z =E2=88=BC 6.5 http://www.eso.org/~jvernet/mobasher05.pdf
From reference 4) In summary therefore, Figures 4 and 5 suggest that the HUDF-JD2 is likely to be an extremely massive galaxy observed at 6 < z < 8 which formed the bulk of its stars at zform > 9. The size of the observed Ks -3.6 micrometers break implies a post-starburst system now being observed in a quiescent state.
Translated into english the above paragraph gives:
The researchers are particularly intrigued by the fact that star formation in the galaxy seems to have already been completed. This implies that the bulk of the activity that built up the galaxy had occurred even earlier. (Reference 3)
This object is eight times the Milky way. http://ipac.jpl.nasa.gov/media_images/ssc2005-19a2.jpg .
- References:
- Big-Bang Theory Disproved
- From: In Fo
- Big-Bang Theory Disproved
- Prev by Date: Brightness of Mars
- Next by Date: Re: How does this galaxy change formation theories?
- Previous by thread: Big-Bang Theory Disproved
- Next by thread: Re: Big-Bang Theory Disproved
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
