Re: New Horizons - Question
- From: Jonathan Silverlight <jsilverlight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:01:15 +0000
In message <1137709210.961760.147020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, qed100@xxxxxxxxxxx writes
MadDogR75@xxxxxxxxx wrote:In Re: New Horizons - Mission to Pluto (link: www.nature.com/news/2006/060116-2.html) Vehicle will have 'Long Range Telescope` as part of instrument package. Sched; jupiter - 2007, Pluto - 2015
It occurs to me that since we will have a high definition, low light instrument in place at a known distance,the opportunity will exist for some 'hellofa long baseline` distance measurement. Since many of our distance measurements are hierarchially based on the distance of the Cephied variables, (whose origional distances were measured by earth orbit parallax), doesn't this mission offer an opportunity to improve the accuracy of the whole hierarchy of long distance measurement, especially as distances are now so signifcant a factor in cosmology?
Do we know the location of the vehicle with sufficient accuracy at any given time to make the effort worthwhile? Would the tasking of the telescope to a few 'star field` images overload the mission? Is the whole idea flawed in some way?
This isn't a bad idea. But the New Horizons telescope has an objective mirror of only 8.2 inches, whereas very many instruments have apertures many times that, giving them resolving powers which probably make up for the difference in stellar parallax between Earth's & Pluto's orbits. In fact, the Hipparcus satellite was orbited several years ago for the single purpose of astrometry with revolutionary precision. I'm betting that it alone has made cepheid distance measurements exact enough to be a non-issue.
If you do a search for "parallax measurements", you'll find that this was seriously considered for the Voyager probes and there have been several discussions on Usenet, but it wasn't considered practical.
I'm disappointed - I've also learned that New Horizons isn't a a good platform to look for the Pioneer anomaly :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Horizons - Question
- From: qed100
- Re: New Horizons - Question
- From: qed100
- Re: New Horizons - Question
- References:
- New Horizons - Question
- From: MadDogR75
- Re: New Horizons - Question
- From: qed100
- New Horizons - Question
- Prev by Date: Re: New Horizons - Question
- Next by Date: Re: New Horizons - Question
- Previous by thread: Re: New Horizons - Question
- Next by thread: Re: New Horizons - Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|