Re: Gravity Probe B
- From: spope33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Steve Pope)
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
<carlip-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For a nice summary of the current status, see Bob Kahn's short article in
the fall 2005 issue of Matters of Gravity, http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/ .
(Incidentally, the experimentalists I know would like nothing better than
to find a result that clearly disagrees with GR. Experimentalists live to
prove theorists wrong. A confirmation of GR leads to a reaction, "Ho hum,
nice experiment, but no surprise." A disconfirmation is where the real
prestige would lie.)
Isn't one of the hoped-for results a proof or disproof of
string theory?
If so I think a confirmation or a disconfirmation would carry
equal prestige.
Steve
.
- References:
- Gravity Probe B
- From: Steve Pope
- Re: Gravity Probe B
- From: Llanzlan Klazmon
- Re: Gravity Probe B
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Gravity Probe B
- From: carlip-nospam
- Gravity Probe B
- Prev by Date: Re: Gravity Probe B
- Next by Date: Re: Dark Matter
- Previous by thread: Re: Gravity Probe B
- Next by thread: Re: Gravity Probe B
- Index(es):