Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:08:26 -0500
"Jeff Root" <jeff5@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143745300.712836.75860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Greg Neill replied to Jeff Root:
photons are practically oblivious to electric and
magnetic fields; photon-photon interactions have an
incredibly small cross section. The interaction,
according to quantum theory is, if memory serves, a
third order effect which is practically nil.
How might I coax two photons to interact?
The simplest way is to have them do so in the
presence of a particle. Alone, two photons very
rarely interact.
What maximizes the probability of two photons interacting
without a particle? They both have to exist at the same
time. What else? Should they collide perpendicularly?
Head-on? With the fields aligned? Or opposed? Or...?
I'm no expert in Quantum Theory, but my gut feeling
would be to duplicate the conditions of a matter-
antimatter annihilation in reverse, that is, have
two equal energy photons meet head-on. I would
welcome input from more knowledgeable sources.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- From: charleswehner
- Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- References:
- Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- From: charleswehner
- Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- From: Thomas Smid
- Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- From: Jeff Root
- Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- From: Jeff Root
- Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- Prev by Date: Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- Next by Date: Re: Cluster and Double Star witness a new facet of Earth's magnetic behaviour (Forwarded)
- Previous by thread: Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- Next by thread: Re: Eclipse and EINSTEIN
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|