Re: Keplerian Trajectory
- From: Llanzlan Klazmon <Klazmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Apr 2006 13:00:38 +1200
clusardi2k@xxxxxxx wrote in news:1144244869.312028.216920
@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com:
What is it?
Thank you,
Christopher Lusardi
I'm not sure that Bill's explanation is quite right. Historically, a
Keplerian trajectory would be a segment of a Keplerian orbit as described
by Keplers first law. This means a segment of an ellipse (or circle as a
circle is just an ellipse with zero eccentricity). The other conic sections
mentioned, a parabola or hyperbolia, which are also solutions to Newton's
laws for a two body problem involving gravity would not qualify, as Kepler
himself did not know of such orbits.
Klazmon.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Keplerian Trajectory
- From: Bill Owen
- Re: Keplerian Trajectory
- References:
- Keplerian Trajectory
- From: clusardi2k
- Keplerian Trajectory
- Prev by Date: Re: New solar twin could shed light on another Earth (Forwarded)
- Next by Date: Mercury's formation impact splattered Earth with material (Forwarded)
- Previous by thread: Re: Keplerian Trajectory
- Next by thread: Re: Keplerian Trajectory
- Index(es):