Re: Clarification on Earth's age
- From: " George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 15:21:51 -0400
"Friar Broccoli" <EliasRK@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1148746802.077542.191250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George wrote:
"Friar Broccoli" <EliasRK@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
If this is correct, then the 4.55 billion year estimate is not
an estimate of Earth's age, but of the average time of the
explosions of the super-novas which contributed heavy elements
to our solar system.
.
When the earth was formed (some say during a collision with a mars-sized
body), it was mostly molten, so the lead clock would have reset at that
time.
The only way I can imagine for resetting the clock is creating new
lead isotopes. A collision between two planets obviously cannot
do this, so how is the clock reset?
Cordially;
Friar Broccoli
Robert Keith Elias, Quebec, Canada Email: EliasRK (of) gmail * com
Best programmer's & all purpose text editor: http://www.semware.com
--------- I consider ALL arguments in support of my views ---------
Isotopic clocks have been shown many times to have been reset under certain
circumstances. The isotopic clocks in granite can be reset through
metamorphism (and more than once, if it undergoes repeated metamorphism),
for instance. It is not a new phenomenon.
George
.
- References:
- Clarification on Earth's age
- From: Friar Broccoli
- Re: Clarification on Earth's age
- From: George
- Re: Clarification on Earth's age
- From: Friar Broccoli
- Clarification on Earth's age
- Prev by Date: Re: Clarification on Earth's age
- Next by Date: Re: Clarification on Earth's age
- Previous by thread: Re: Clarification on Earth's age
- Next by thread: BUT de broglie's ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|