Re: Divine math and planetary orbits
- From: "Ray Tomes" <ray.tomes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 May 2006 18:05:54 -0700
It has been claimed that the planets follow a phi ratio, but they do
not - it is easy to calculate these values and see that they don't.
There was a theory put forward that included a ratio of 1.723 rather
than phi (1.618) which fits the average ratio better. This theory also
has a sine wave departure from the expected values and was used
successfully to predict a number of extra satellites of Uranus and/or
Neptune before discovery.
However the inbner and outer planets actually are nearer to making two
arithmetic series than one geometric series.
Ray
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Divine math and planetary orbits
- From: Rising-Star8471
- Re: Divine math and planetary orbits
- References:
- Divine math and planetary orbits
- From: Rising-Star8471
- Divine math and planetary orbits
- Prev by Date: Re: Clarification on Earth's age
- Next by Date: Re: Divine math and planetary orbits
- Previous by thread: Divine math and planetary orbits
- Next by thread: Re: Divine math and planetary orbits
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|