Re: Divine math and planetary orbits

"Rising-Star8471" <j.a.lively@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1148910814.291411.77940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

The divine formula (phi) is dupilctaed all around us in nature.

My question is, does the diameter of planetary orbits follow this
formula as well, and if so, has it been used to determine the orbital
diameter of a missing planet?

Planetary orbits are approximately elliptical with varying eccentricity. If
by diameter you are meaning the major axis of their orbits then no.
Neptune's position was computed by Adams and LeVerier based on
perturbations noticed in the orbit of Uranus. It turns out though, that
they were a bit lucky, as their calculations were not so good mainly due to
poor data. The new discoveries in the outer solar system (the Kuiper belt)
are found by automated comparator surveys using digital images of the same
area taken at different times.

Klazmon.


From what has been determined from extra solar system planets, there are
all sorts of configurations out there.




I would do it myself, but im having a hard time doing the math (im not
the greatest math guy), but anyone with the skills to run the numbers,
I would be interested in the results.


.