Re: Divine math and planetary orbits
- From: "Rising-Star8471" <j.a.lively@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2006 05:29:42 -0700
yes i agree as far as the discovery of Neptune........
And it has occured to me that the solar system is dynamic, not static
and has changed quite a bit since its conception. Jupiter and Saturns
orbits have been changed at least once since the birth of the solar
system
I tried doing the math, and the distance between orbits doesnt seem to
be in proportion with anything else.
And without visually seeing the early configuration of the solar
system, it would just be another guess based on myth.
Still, it was a nice thought.......and I believe that there is enough
material in the Kuiper Belt to explain the inconsistancies with Neptune
and Uranus orbit (and of course they are pulling on each other as well)
On a related note, Voyager 1 should almost be far enough away to snap a
picture of the solar system as it appears from outside the heliosheath.
Problem is, it takes forever to get a signal out there, Voyager 1 still
checks in, Voyager 2 has gottin all pissy and wont talk unless its
talked to (which means if you dont know which way to point the dish,
your screwed) Not to mention there power is almost exhausted, there may
not be enough juice left to snap a picture.
PLUS the two voyagers are currently the fastest moving space objects
created by humans. Hauling outta here at more than twice the speed
needed to escape earths gravity ( I beilive it was a gravity boost from
neptune that made this possible.)
.
- References:
- Divine math and planetary orbits
- From: Rising-Star8471
- Re: Divine math and planetary orbits
- From: Llanzlan Klazmon
- Divine math and planetary orbits
- Prev by Date: Re: Dear Google
- Next by Date: Re: Divine math and planetary orbits
- Previous by thread: Re: Divine math and planetary orbits
- Next by thread: Re: Divine math and planetary orbits
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
