Re: Redshift without expansion

On a sunny day (26 Jun 2006 06:25:12 -0700) it happened "sean"
<jaymoseley@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<1151328311.865188.13890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

William Hamblen wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:34:21 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpeatmje@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I once did read something like:
The changing electric field creates a magnetic field at 90 degrees, when
that magnetic field finally collapses (=changes) it creates an changing
electric field again, etc etc the wave rolls along....
Fun, do not know (was that Maxwell too?) who it was that wrote that.

You have your oscillating E (electric) field and your B (magnetic)
field (or H field depending on the system of notation you're using)
and the E vectors and B vectors are at right angles to each other.
You don't have one without the other, which is why they call it
electromagnetic radiation. The fields don't collapse, exactly, until
they interact with something, which is when quantum mechanics raises
its head
But its not oscillating in a dimension. So how can 2 vectors that are
not dimension vectors or at least not the flux vector, be at 90 degrees
to each other. Thats sort of like saying that sound waves amplitude is
at right angles to its direction of propogation.

Well, I am not endlessly going to try defend something I just did read,
but think for a moment:
The changing electric field will generate a magnetic field 'further away',
theat in turn will generate an electric field even further away....
The electric and magnetic fields are 90 degrees out of phase.
So one 'vector' is rotating sin(w.t) and the other cos(w.t) where 'w'
is 2 x pi x f.

I thought one way to describe redshift without any new particles or
tired light baggage would be to have the speed of oscilattion of the
magnetic field slow by a very small constant amount each oscillation
coupled with a constant c of wave propogation. So that only over great
cosmological distances would the lengthening of wavelength be
observable.
Sean

That is 'tired light' theory is it not?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Stupid questions about EMR
    ... and EM waves as just passing through. ... a magnetic field is generated, ... reaction" whereas a changing electric field generates a changing ... generates a changing electric field which in turn ... ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Questions (Space)
    ... electric field lines as being red. ... so the magnetic field is called the "B field." ... In either the electric field or the magnetic field, energy is stored. ... The rate at which the alternation happens ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Redshift without expansion
    ... The changing electric field creates a magnetic field at 90 degrees, ... that magnetic field finally collapses it creates an changing ... electric field again, etc etc the wave rolls along.... ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Redshift without expansion
    ... The changing electric field creates a magnetic field at 90 degrees, ... that magnetic field finally collapses it creates an changing ... electric field again, etc etc the wave rolls along.... ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Redshift without expansion
    ... The changing electric field creates a magnetic field at 90 degrees, ... electric field again, etc etc the wave rolls along.... ... do not know (was that Maxwell too?) who it was that wrote that. ... Thats also called redshift without expansion.> ...
    (sci.astro)
Quantcast