Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: "sean" <jaymoseley@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Jun 2006 06:25:12 -0700
William Hamblen wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:34:21 GMT, Jan PanteltjeBut its not oscillating in a dimension. So how can 2 vectors that are
<pNaonStpeatmje@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I once did read something like:
The changing electric field creates a magnetic field at 90 degrees, when
that magnetic field finally collapses (=changes) it creates an changing
electric field again, etc etc the wave rolls along....
Fun, do not know (was that Maxwell too?) who it was that wrote that.
You have your oscillating E (electric) field and your B (magnetic)
field (or H field depending on the system of notation you're using)
and the E vectors and B vectors are at right angles to each other.
You don't have one without the other, which is why they call it
electromagnetic radiation. The fields don't collapse, exactly, until
they interact with something, which is when quantum mechanics raises
its head
not dimension vectors or at least not the flux vector, be at 90 degrees
to each other. Thats sort of like saying that sound waves amplitude is
at right angles to its direction of propogation.
I thought one way to describe redshift without any new particles or
tired light baggage would be to have the speed of oscilattion of the
magnetic field slow by a very small constant amount each oscillation
coupled with a constant c of wave propogation. So that only over great
cosmological distances would the lengthening of wavelength be
observable.
Sean
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: Joseph Lazio
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- References:
- Redshift without expansion
- From: sean
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: sean
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: sean
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: sean
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: sean
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Redshift without expansion
- From: William Hamblen
- Redshift without expansion
- Prev by Date: Re: Redshift without expansion
- Next by Date: Re: Redshift without expansion
- Previous by thread: Re: Redshift without expansion
- Next by thread: Re: Redshift without expansion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|