Re: The Age of the Earth today
- From: ivars.fabriciuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 13 Aug 2006 13:35:34 -0700
Well, I am very open to new ideas, so if I read e.g ancient texts or
Your mails , I never judge.
I read literally, trying to understand what they are saying, and why.
I do not doubt the other persons ability to think; I doubt my ability
to interpret at the beginning much more.
So if I read e.g. "dark ages" first I think the sky was darker then,
and try to understand how it was possible. Does it fit?
If I read that Indians called ches game of life, i think why? What is
in the game such that it could be used to simulate life in some way?
When I see that bible is trying to pass knowledge of important numbers,
e.g. 7 generations, 4 levels, or Vedas knowledge was divided in 4
parts 28 time I so not take it lightly as weekday simbols.
Ancient priest were the most powerful people in their nation; todays
astrologs are not; again, my interpretation is simple: it is not us who
have grown so clever and do not listen any more to fairy tails, but our
astrologs are just much worse at predicting future then old time
priests. And so on.
children fairy tailes and language as such is a vey big topic in Human
genetic code passed on by knowledge, language, texts.
To finalize, I strongly believe that humans can only write down :
50% what htey have seen, heard or read
12,5 % what they have conjectured from experience by laws they
believed were true at that time
37,5 % irrational ideas which nevertheless can only carry elements of
first 2, but they are not rationally organized, bu laws.
No way any human ever was able to imagine something outside this.
As understanding and knowledge grew, variations became bigger and
bigger, "novels" appeared, but still the same truth holds- there is
nothing in the texts which is either experience, hypothesis or chaotic
mix of both.
Nothing which is not in nature at least as element of experience can
appear in conscience.
Age of Earth is connected to powers of 2 as any time scale in Universe
is because of its nested structure and gravitational clock-type
buildup.
2^32 came from the fact that it is close to Earth age + there are come
conjectures about events in 2012 -or 2018 which, if Universe has
internal clock with rotating masses and sends synchronizing pulses when
any of them has dx/dt=0, d2x/dt2=0 (change of sign) the pulse could be
quite powerful, corresponding to reasonable size catastrophic event on
Earth.
Then I have to go into model of Earth with 5 rotating layers which
probably is a herecy again ( I have not been part of physics
establishment, so I do not know) , but 2^32 would be a period of outer
core rotation ( axis from Africa-pacific) which is the cause for
movement of plates. Just gravity and rotation- why do we need more
complex models?
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear ivars.fabriciuss:
<ivars.fabriciuss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1155495872.918956.80400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
not all numerology is despisable, as mathematics is
all things which matter can form,and vice versa.
i have more than chess behind this thinking, but as
no listens anyway, i just post results.
Why do you think no one listens, if you only post "results"?
Some people enjoy chess.
also, i am deeply convicted that ancient people
where not idiots we try to make of them.
I haven't heard that. I hear Pythagoras mentioned quite often.
Even though he was eventually convinced he was (a) god.
The least likely action of any human is to write
down, tell, include in language in games things
they havent seen, heard or felt.
Ever heard of a novel?
it is only our inability to interpret the ideas like
chess that forces us to create complex
explanations like : the ancients never were able
to write down what they saw, so they invented
everything!
Did you mean to say "reinvented"?
i have never heard a more unnatural thing-
people writing down things they have never
seen, heard or felt.
Has happened for millenia. Child stories, for the purpose of
instruction, involving characters and situations that are wholly
contrived.
People can not conjure so much, nor they
want to.. their natural inclination is to tell
truth to the future generations to pass on
survival, genetic knowledge.
You cannot possibly believe this. You know quite well that the
"victors" are the ones that write history. They don't tell the
truth to the future. Just something that is hopefully fully
consistent.
it is a shame taht after thousands of years we are
still unable to read it, but consider ourselves
SUPERIOR and judge them from own limited Box.
And what did this diatribe have to do with the Age of the Earth
and/or Science?
David A. Smith
.
- References:
- The Age of the Earth today
- From: ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: The Age of the Earth today
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The Age of the Earth today
- From: ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: The Age of the Earth today
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- The Age of the Earth today
- Prev by Date: Re: The Age of the Earth today
- Next by Date: Formula for alfa
- Previous by thread: Re: The Age of the Earth today
- Next by thread: AMERICA IN DANGER: Secret Torture Rooms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|