Citaton wanted - curves of constant cosmological time can't be geodesics
- From: spamme606@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 24 Aug 2006 01:25:49 -0700
From:spamme606 aka 'pervect' on physicsforums
I'm looking for a citation for the fact that a curve of constant
cosmological time, such as the curve of constant cosmological time
whose length defines the comoving distance between two points, is not a
geodesic.
Thus the comvoing distance is not measured along a geodesic curve.
This is reasonbly obvious if one writes the metric
dt^2 - a(t)^2 dx^2
and the corresponding geodesic equations
d^2 t / d tau^2 + a da/dt (dx/d tau)^2 = 0
d^2 x / d tau^2 + (2/a) ( da/dt ) (dx / d tau) (dt / dtau) = 0
A curve of constant time has d^2 t / dtau^2 = 0. Given a(t)>0 and an
expanding universe da/dt>0, the only solution is (dx / d tau) = 0,
which is a point, not a curve.
Since this will eventually wind up in a Wikipedia article, it won't
necessarily be obvious to the casual reader, and I think it would be
classifiable as "original research" :-(.
Therfore I would like, if possible, a citation to the literature which
points out this fact.
For my own info, I would also like to know if there is any standard
distance measure in cosmology which defines the "distance" between two
points along the geodesic curve connecting them, rather than a
coordinate-based defintion of a curve of constant cosmological time.
So far I haven't run accross any such defintion in my search of what
textbooks I could find.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: 23-Aug-2006: *76* Days & Counting!
- Next by Date: The Final IAU Resolution on the definition of "planet" ready for voting (Forwarded)
- Previous by thread: NASA Galaxy Hunter: Huge Black Holes Stifle Star Formation
- Next by thread: The Final IAU Resolution on the definition of "planet" ready for voting (Forwarded)
- Index(es):