Re: The IAU Draft Definition of 'Planet' and 'Plutons'
- From: Saul Levy <saullevy1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:01:47 -0700
I agree, Yama. Seems like astronomy is now too pc.
Saul Levy
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:18:20 +0000 (UTC), Yama
<tjama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is some weird ***, yo. Why the heck they had to propose something.
so complex and unworkable? Since any definition is going to be more or
less arbitrary, just put a simple, arbitrary limit somewhere and be
done with it and don't bother about barycenters and double planets and
whatnot.
- Prev by Date: IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU Resolution votes (Forwarded)
- Next by Date: Re: Pluto loses status as a planet
- Previous by thread: Re: The IAU Draft Definition of 'Planet' and 'Plutons'
- Next by thread: Venus atmosphere
- Index(es):
