Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: "George Dishman" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:00:36 +0100
"Rob" <rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1161445513.405586.203550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George Dishman wrote:
I'm not sure I follow you here, surely both neutralinos
and black holes are forms of CDM. Dark because they do
not emit (BHs do absorb light but are probably too dense
to be detected by that absorption) and 'cold' because
they are not moving at relativistic speeds. In that case
going from neutralinos to BHs isn't a paradigm shift.
Sorry, I should specified that the Big Bang predicts subatomic
particle-mass CDM, ...
Really? I thought MACHOs were a standard big bang
candidate. Where do you get this prediction from?
George
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- References:
- Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- Next by Date: Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- Previous by thread: Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- Next by thread: Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- Index(es):