Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: "George Dishman" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:09:06 +0100
"Rob" <rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1161800301.365718.32360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George Dishman wrote:
That's your choice, but my answer was that I have no
problem accepting the findings of the paper you cited,
I just didn't find anything in it to answer the question
we were discussing. It relates to how the MACHOs
that have been detected are split between the LMC
and the MW halos, not their total mass contribution
in relation to the amount of dark matter needed.
You can lead a donkey to water, but you cannot make him drink.
Are you saying that's not what the paper says?
I think you are just seeing what you would like
to be there.
George
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- References:
- Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: George Dishman
- Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- From: Rob
- Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- Next by Date: Re: GLOBAL WARMING
- Previous by thread: Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- Next by thread: Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|