Re: Discrete Fractal Paradigm
- From: Joseph Lazio <jlazio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Oct 2006 07:09:32 -0400
"R" == Rob <rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
R> The Discrete Fractal paradigm is still quite young, and has had
R> only one person working on it. The Big Bang paradigm is very old
R> and it has a cult of thousands to keep it propped up. These cult
R> members also use a lot of academic bullying and intellectual
R> intimidation to dissuade others from challenging their beliefs,
R> which become ever more "religious".
Is this the same "cult" that used to think that the rate of expansion
of the Universe is slowing, but, because the data have demanded, now
think that the rate of expansion is accelerating? The same "cult"
that, once the cosmic microwave background was discovered, dropped the
Steady State Model for not agreeing with the data?
Same as it ever was: When you can't convince them by showing data that
agree with a new idea, resort to ad hominem attacks.
--
Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: jlazio@xxxxxxxxxxx
No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/
sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Discrete Fractal Paradigm
- From: Rob
- Re: Discrete Fractal Paradigm
- References:
- Re: Good News for Big Bang theory
- From: rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Good News for Big Bang theory
- From: George Dishman
- Discrete Fractal Paradigm
- From: Rob
- Re: Good News for Big Bang theory
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow Motion Cosmological Train Wreck
- Next by Date: Re: the end of our sun-white dwarf or red giant?
- Previous by thread: Re: Discrete Fractal Paradigm
- Next by thread: Re: Discrete Fractal Paradigm
- Index(es):