Re: Science and Equations


"Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:N1t2h.116693$lT5.71819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"George Dishman" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eidei6$93u$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Hexenmeister" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:VWd2h.78610$3x1.40435@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "George Dishman" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:eibacq$fn$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | "Hexenmeister" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | news:9Z52h.98672$lT5.96218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | >
| > | > "Rob" <rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | > news:1162404555.600370.227060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > | George Dishman wrote:
| > | > | >
| > | > | > Mass of an electron: 9.1093826 * 10^-28 g
| > | > | >
| > | > | > The upper limit for the mass of a neutrino is
| > | > | > around 10^-33 g so what is the significance
| > | > | > of your version of the Planck mass if there
| > | > | > are mundane objects far less massive?
| > | > |
| > | > |
| > | > | I am sorry, but the reasoning of your argument here seems a bit
| > daft.
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > |
| > | > | I would ask objective, scientifically-minded readers to check
out
| > the
| > | > | two versions for the Planck scale, which are posted above, and
draw
| > | > | your own conclusions.
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | > Dishman is as daft as they come.
| > | > Nobody can measure a gram to 35 decimal places.
| > |
| > | Clueless as always, the value above only has 8 significant
| > | digits which is the measurement accuracy required.
| > |
| > | George
| >
| > 10^-28 is lot of decimal places, dumb***.
|
| It's even more if you measure

There is no "if", I said you can't measure it, shithead.
Nobody can measure a gram to 35 decimal places.

Still as clueless as ever, they measure to 8 places.

Dishman is as FUCKING STUPID as they come.

Take it up with CODATA pal, its the value they
publish, but you might try to learn some basic
physics first to avoid embarrassing yourself.

Since your posts are as vacuous as ever ...

<plonk>


.

Quantcast