Re: Is the idea that hydrogen in the air can 'make energy' a bb sensitive topic?

On Feb 3, 11:02 pm, gb6...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Feb 3, 6:35 pm, "Meme" <kevinjba...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This is a hypothesis which if proven correct would be a valuable
idea. However, theory alone can prove it incorrect based on the Law
of Conservation of Energy. It is basically the idea that you don't
get something for nothing and that there is no such thing as a free
lunch. I encourage the author to stand upon the shoulders of giants
(such as Newton) and come up with more ideas.

Burning fuel. The energy is in the burning hydrogen, which
should provide (according to websites) just as much power
as gasoline for cars, in which case hydrogen, as burning
gas can produce energy.

What is in use is hydrogen fuel cells, an electric version,
not combustion version. When hydrogen mixes with oxygen
in the air, electricity is produced.

The cost of producing hydrogen is more than the cost the
elctricity the fuel cell version produces, meaning Conservation
of Energy is applies. But if burning hydrogen, one gets more
power as gasoline gives. This more power is sufficient
to get the hydrogen for burning from the air.

Air conditioners produce water as a waste product (actually
quite a lot of water that most people are unaware of, water
even in the driest Sahara is extracted by air conditioners
from the air). Electrolysis is pretty effective and extracts
hydrogen out of water using simple electricity.

A car would run forever. The cost is only a few thousand
dollars for this simple system, and air conditioning,
electricity and free water can be produced (not for drinking
as snow, as this water is pure). A cruiseship, you name
it can burn hydrogen instead of oil. As I read the carbon
monoxide produced does not harm the environment,
but environmentalists should know.

George

Next I will succeed in setting the entire ocean on cold fire
for a day, harmless fire they use in a circus.

.

Relevant Pages