Re: Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing?
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:37:16 -0400
"Andrew Nowicki" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:46118128.93AF3292@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Greg Neill wrote:
Sial is the top layer and would be expected to be the source
of much of the material ejected by the mars-sized impactor
that created the Moon. The 70% of the Earth's surface
covered by ocean is largely areas produced by spreading
zones where magma is welling up.
So what's the problem?
1. When a ball-shaped moon collides with a ball-shaped
Earth, the moon cannot scrape 70% of the Earth's surface.
Even a shovel-shaped moon cannot scrape 70% of the Earth's
surface.
2. The oceanic crust is made of sima, not sial.
1. It was not hypothesized that a moon collided with the Earth,
but a Mars-sized body.
2. The impact was off-center, but not a "scooping" blow.
Where does your 70% come from?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing?
- From: simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing?
- References:
- Re: Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing?
- From: Andrew Nowicki
- Re: Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing?
- Next by Date: Re: Expansion-what formula for redshift?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|