Re: Why is 70% of Earth's sial missing?

On Apr 2, 3:18 pm, Andrew Nowicki <and...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is very difficult to imagine any geological or
astronomical event that could selectively scoop up
sial from 70% of the Earth's surface. I believe that
the most probable event was a sequence of three
collisions:


I agree, that not one but many significant impacting events must have
morphed, iced down and having so extensively salted the surface of
Earth. Of course, there's no such proof that Earth originated within
this solar system, and there's even less proof pertaining to our salty
moon. Mars seems much older than Earth, and Venus seems much less old
than Earth.

How much if any sial is on that deck of our physically dark and nasty
moon?

How much of an element does salt account for?

At times of such an icy proto-moon representing itself as an incoming
NEO, as likely having previously passed so close to impacting, it must
have seemed exactly like the end of the world to many, and actually
becoming the end of the world to many others caught in its gravity and
aerobraking wake. The actual glancing blow of that icy sucker upon
having accomplished its dastardly deed, whereas I'd have to think a
good third of most everything living upon this Earth would have been
killed off or traumatised well enough past the point of no return.

That true geology specified date of 11,700 BP also sounds just about
right on the money for the final lithobraking, ocean basin creating,
antipode worthy and seasonal tilt causing arrival of our moon, which
should have seriously kicked all sorts of planetology as well as human
*** upon its icy arrival. At the very least the near miss of such an
icy proto-moon should have been downright interesting, if not a touch
lethal for a great many.

There should also have been those significant teratonne bergs of moon
ice falling upon Earth for a few thousands of years past the time of
that initial glancing blow.

BTW; there's still nothing contained in any bible or koran, as
interpreted to our environment having that moon as of prior to 10,000
BC (12,007 BP), or even of somewhat earlier. When exactly was the
first humanly made record of our moon?

What do you folks think about complex intelligent ET life, as for such
having survived their extended interstellar trek, as safely coexisting
within a few of those proto-moon ice caves? (I know that even I could
do as much [how about yourself?])

Within such a deep enough icy moon cave (assuming all the way down to
the moon's surface) would have accommodated all the essential elements
for survival, including sufficient isolation from the bad sorts of
cosmic and solar radiation, and otherwise having provided loads of
easily accessible O2 for sustaining our kind of frail DNA/RNA.

I'm thinking our moon could have been covered by as much as a 262 km
thick layer of salty ice, of which obviously lost much of its icy load
upon encountering Earth, and especially that of our 1AU nearby solar
energy would have summarily evaporated and/or having solar wind
extracted all such vapors of salty ice that wasn't otherwise safely
sequestered underground.

That pesky GW traumatising moon of ours is still in the process of
losing the remainders of its naked surface element of sodium. (not
nearly enough gravity nor having a magnetosphere as to otherwise
prevent the loss of such ice and sodium)

Too bad the faith-based souls of this Earth are so afraid of their own
shadows. Too bad we still haven't accomplished the Earth/moon science
platform as efficiently station-keeping itself within the moon's L1.
Too bad we're headed directly for WWIII over the remains of the
affordably accessible worth of global energy domination (including
yellowcake). Too bad that so many innocent folks have paid the
ultimate price, with lots more about to pay their's (especially nasty
if being Muslim is their only option within their established family
traditions).
-
Brad Guth

.