The psychology of the psychopath

In Austria there was a man who kidnapped an 11 year old girl and kept
her in a tiny dark place dug under his home. She yelled but nobody
could hear her. At age 18 she escaped from her captor.

He is a captor. As that my psychopath online followed me, collected
all information about me, and even used my name in an attempt to
signal 'I follow you, I know everything about you, I use your name, I
own everything about you, you are mine', the classical behavior of
killers with the darkness of schizophrenia in their heads.

I have seen a lot of this kind of behavior in junior highschool in the
USA, where kids hated each other and followed each other home and
acted psychotic in ways of revenge.

That man in Austria was obviously deeply mentally ill, like half his
brain missing, insanity. But there is one thing that all psychopaths
share: to possess somebody in the deepest ways, an inner urge to
kidnap somebody, and take over his/her life in torturous sadistic
ways.

Hitler was sadistic, and he was impotent. He was aroused instead from
public speaches and he admitted of having orgasms during his speech.
He saw it sexual to be dominant, a psychopath in power, one with
damage to his nucleus amigdalae, a common problem of impotence among
those who do dominatrix, torturing.

The psychotic mind of emotional poorness, learning difficulties and a
person strongly bound to systems of power lives detached from emotions
and has the qualities of an endless tormenting state that when given
an openness turns into the most dark brutal forms of revenge driven by
a psychological madness. Yes Hitler was such a mad person, he turned
the mentality of a psychopath into a mass phenomena, into a torturous
dictatorship that follows all people, tortures all in prisons, kills
all handicapped who lives off of the society and welfare, and
establishes a super-model, a racist perfection who orders all others
to his mercy of power. It was a world of nazi, a world of being
superior no matter what and not caring of democracy or human rights
only of stalking superiority of state, a being of dominance.

There are psychotic violations of human rights everywhere, human
rights torture takes place everywhere, the words of most Americans are
extremely psychotic when they talk of those living off wellfare, and
all the memories of Hitler killing off the handicapped comes back,
that these people are supremacists and are taught as once communists
did, now the capitalist extreme learned to think as Hitler, and for
them it is not the streets belong to people but to citizens of rights.
For them rights solve everything, even healthcare. Yes, a brainwashed
psychopath of dominance embraced in a regime of power, one that votes
100 percent for war under the Republican party. Western countries were
founded on Democracy and human rights, but Bush threw everything away
when he went after Saddam, and the racism that plaggued the US
government historically took dirty course.

When the psychopath came after me, I contacted the police and they
said there is nothing that can be done because the man is in Germany.
If he would be in the USA, the police would give him a visit.

So here I am, the man is not as active as he was in following/stalking/
scaring and possessing my life for who knows what in his mind things
he might do to me, and here I am, speaking of such monsters on the
Internet like those violating human rights in the NET Kook Awards and
like Hitler did with jews 'labeling' those online who would never be
members to this idea and they are stalking people with a fascist
labeling game.

Now the question: There are millions of people online, and one never
knows who he meets on the Internet. Should I wipe out all psychopaths
on the Internet for the crime of one psychopath? Should I have all
those criminals of stalking in jail?

Was it two days ago that Bush spoke of those in Iraq who fight are the
same who would come to the USA.

Bush is implying that religious logic that it is because of who they
are, they must be eliminated.
Is it right for me to (in terms of human rights) to warn others of the
dangers online of what psychopaths do to others and not allow them to
play fascist games, to follow people (masses) in organized forms, to
discriminate with labels in organized forms, to frame people, to make
fool of people in public and leave the boss at work with questions of
why a person of labeled so agressively as a NET Kook for all to see.
When I was labeled online with vicious labeling I felt my human rights
were violated and all my privacy destroyed forever. I couldn't take
human rights violations that occured in regards to discrimination in
World War II, hate crimes, hate campaigns, a psycho who acts like a
vicious killer in my life and wants to possess me, and so I find all
these psychos in my mind on the Internet, and then do what? The answer
though you are brainwashed is that no it is not normal to go after all
the psychos on the Internet, though human rights activism and
awareness does not have to be thought of negatively.

For Bush to think of all terrorists as a burden to all and go insane
for the crime of one is not normal. This is a perfect subject for
psychologists. No it is not clear that those who fight in Iraq are the
exact same people who would come to the USA.

.