Re: Localized Big Bang
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:11:29 -0400
<gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1179589589.443709.97060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Greetings and Salutations:
From: "Greg Neill" <gneill...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
If there
are other universes with their own Big Bang events, they
are unconnected to ours, cannot be observed, and have no
influence at all on our universe.
O.K... So even if light from the "other universe" were to enter our
universe then that would constitute "connecting" the universes.
Correct?
Correct, since clearly there would have to be a spacial
path between source and destination.
On Apr 29, 10:06 am, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <d...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
This doesn't mean that there may not be other Universes fully
parallel to ours, or that they might not intermingle at some
point in the future. Just nothing like that has happened in the
~13 Gy displayed.
David A. Smith
Since everything is moving away from a central point, another universe
colliding with ours would (by definition) have objects moving from
*that* central expansion point. Thank you.
Except that the universe has no center in space; it's
expanding from every point in all directions equally.
.
- References:
- Re: Localized Big Bang
- From: gandalf
- Re: Localized Big Bang
- Prev by Date: Re: Telescope Warehouse: Bill Vorce
- Next by Date: Re: Localized Big Bang
- Previous by thread: Re: Localized Big Bang
- Next by thread: Re: Localized Big Bang
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|