Re: Supernova, Hypernova, Ultranova ?
- From: Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet <tadapope@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 05:54:27 -0000
I'd call it an implosive megarotarynova - devoid of a black hole
but with plenty of white holes. Yes, I said white holes. If we
can have a black hole then we can also have a white hole.
Such a fantasy as a megarotarynova could even be an elite
opening to another universe beyond our own universe. If I
were to go thru such an event I'd have to be an energy being
in search of the grandest collective of dimensions ever imagined.
At least 28 dimensions and perhaps even 1000s. Does anything
ever really end or is it just an elegant transmutable recycling
center?
WOMP WOMP
Tom
Saint Isadore
Patron Saint of the Internet
Gautam Majumdar wrote:
What do we call the SN2006gy - an Ultranova ?
Since the link between long period GRB and supernova explosion was
established, as I understood it, big, massive stars undergo a hypernova
explosion and produce a black hole. I remember reading about a minimum
mass of something like 40 solar mass for hypernova explosion. Now it
appears that real, real, supermassive starts (lower mass limit ?) would go
beyond a hypernova explosion and won't have a black hole as a remnant.
What do we call such extreme events ? An Ultranova ?
Eta carniae won't kill us then with a burst of gamma-ray when it goes bang
in near (astronomically speaking) future :-).
--
gautam
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Supernova, Hypernova, Ultranova ?
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Supernova, Hypernova, Ultranova ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Windcupters
- Next by Date: Re: Supernova, Hypernova, Ultranova ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Supernova, Hypernova, Ultranova ?
- Next by thread: Re: Supernova, Hypernova, Ultranova ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|