Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Horace Heffner <hheffner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:22:33 -0700
On Jul 11, 10:49 am, Ian Parker <ianpark...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11 Jul, 19:11, Horace Heffner <hheff...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the gravimagnetic field value is approximated by:
K = i a / v = i (8.33x10-10 m/s2) / (11809 m/s) = 7.05x10-14 i Hz
But that is an IMAGINARY acceleration. What I am sayiong is that to
make it real you have to have the "electric" field associated with the
magnetic field. I am sure that if you do this you will get GR in its
(more or less) standard form.
The Loretnz force that results is real because, under the isomorphism,
gravitational mass is also imaginary. The electric field analog is
the gravitational field g, which also is imaginary. Whether by
induction or by motion in a K field, an apparent g field is produced.
The analogies hold throughout EM, including induction, the potential
field A, Maxwell's laws, etc.
Horace Heffner
.
- References:
- Gravimagnetics
- From: Horace Heffner
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Horace Heffner
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Horace Heffner
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Horace Heffner
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Horace Heffner
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Horace Heffner
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Horace Heffner
- Re: Gravimagnetics
- From: Ian Parker
- Gravimagnetics
- Prev by Date: Re: Gravimagnetics
- Next by Date: Water, water everywhere -- on an extrasolar planet (Forwarded)
- Previous by thread: Re: Gravimagnetics
- Next by thread: Re: Gravimagnetics
- Index(es):