Re: stellar orbits in galaxies

pausch@xxxxxxx (Paul Schlyter) writes:

and why?

Gravity of course!! What did you think?

I guess I didn't ask that very well. Of course it orbits the center of
mass of the inner stars and does so because of gravity. The same could
be said about the Earth with respect to everything closer to the Sun than
the Earth. The most important such thing is the Sun itself and it stands
out as more of a reason that the inner planets. Our Milky Way has at least
one black hole at its galactic center, so its significance, e.g., might be
compared with that of the other inner stars.

I guess the Sun is on the outer part of the spiral, so most of the mass
of the Milky Way is closer to the Sun.


What kinds of general statements can be made about the orbits of the other
stars in the Milky Way? For example, are there some basic classifications
of orbit types?

There are basically two kinds of orbits:

Thanks for this explanation.

If so, how typical is the Sun's orbit?

The Sun's orbit is very typical for population I stars.

The same questions apply as well to other galaxies.

Is it fair to compare the orbits of population II stars with orbits of
comets?

Other spiral galaxies - not elliptical galaxies....

Are orbits in elliptical galaxies more like the motion of molecules in
a gas?

What would be a good book or article to read on stellar orbits in galaxies?

"Galactic Astronomy" by Mihalas is a classic: http://tinyurl.com/34h5hw

Thanks. I have it and should have read it. I'll look at it when I've finished
typing this.

When the Sun moves in its orbit, it bobs up and down in the equatorial plane
of the Milky Way. Why does it do that?

Since our galaxy is a pretty thin disk, there will be a force trying
to bring back any star which gets out of the plane of the disk to the
plane of the disk. If the star's velocity perpendicular to the disk
isn't high, it will be "pulled back" to the disk by this force - or
rather through the disk and out on the other side, where the process
repeats but in the other direction. This causes the Sun, as well as
other population I stars, to bob "up" and "down" when they orbit the
galaxy's center.

So, as regards perpendicular motion, it's kind of like someone drilled a
hole through the Earth and dropped a ball into the hole. Is there any force
that tends to attenuate the bounces? If so, when might we expect the ball
to stop bouncing?

If, for comparison, we look at the orbit of the Earth in the solar
system, is there any comparable bobbing motion?

Not at all as much, for the simple reason that the Sun is a sphere,
not a thin disk. However, our Moon, which follows an orbit inclined
some 5 degrees to the ecliptic, causes the Earth to bob up and down
once every draconical month. As seen from the Sun, this "up-and-down"
motion will be of some +-0.5 arc seconds in amplitude. Perturbations
by the other planets (most notably Venus and Jupiter) will cause a
similar motion but of longer period and smaller amplitude.

That's very interesting. Thanks.
--
Ignorantly,
Allan Adler <ara@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT CSAIL. My actions and
* comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. Also, I am nowhere near Boston.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: stellar orbits in galaxies
    ... mass of the inner stars and does so because of gravity. ... The most important such thing is the Sun itself and it stands ... the square root of the distance to the Sun for circular orbits), ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Evangelical faith healing of AIDS victim
    ... and Earth orbiting around on different orbits? ... #Our galaxy itself contains a hundred billion stars. ... that he states the sun is on in comparison to the Earth. ...
    (uk.philosophy.atheism)
  • Re: stellar orbits in galaxies
    ... The Sun orbits the center of mass of all stars inside the Sun's orbit in our ... star which had its proper motion determined. ... Since our galaxy is a pretty thin disk, there will be a force trying ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Democratic candidates address the issue of global warming while Republicans snooze...
    ... On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Rumpelstiltskin wrote: ... That's actually only as the square, ... It's an oldie but once astronomers were not sure that Saturn and Jupiter were in stable orbits. ... I'm not yet completely willing to give up and say that the three-body is unsolvable, but some people, such as Steven Wolfram, I think have speculated that the only way to solve the problem is algorithmically, and that's why time exists - the steps of time are the working-out of the algorithm. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: SRs velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?
    ... Factors like atmospheric pollution are common ... You are gettting into deeper and deeper trouble Paul. ... I don't doubt that there are a number of reasons why some stars are ... close binaries in highly elliptical orbits will most likely be variables over a ...
    (sci.physics)