Re: Human rights constitution

Human rights constitution (as of 5:10am, Oct.10, 2007) First Point-
Iraq war

Learn the first point of the human rights constitution.


Fair treatment


1. Safety cannot compromise racism, else it is political corruption.


I only got this far, to the first point. Two examples are brought
where safety compromises racism and not seen but should be seen.
Democrats in the USA recently wanted to raise cigarette taxes to give
health insurance to more children. Smokers are shit, kids can get
health insurance. Well... to move one class into neglegence (see
Australia where a main hospital now disallows obese and smoking
individuals to receive treatments did anything they can to maximize
profit. These things create human rights violations as profit is
optimized against wellfare abusers so to speak. Hitler just wanted to
remove those like handicapped from any welfare by terminating them.


Safety works in a non-compromise way. All kids get health insurance
and all old people, hospitals must remain free and social care must
be
given. Some things are basic human dignity. People can always have an
option to pay and choose private treatment, but the government must
provide free treatment. To turn to racism is not an option. To be
Hitler is not a voting right.


Now also note "safety cannot compromise racism or it is corruption"
in Bush's Iraq war. 80-90 percent of Arabs think negatively of
Americans as a result of the Iraq war according to a statistics
made by a Jewish political institute in Israel, while in the past
Arabs thought positively of Americans according to this poll.


Bush generated racism and as that placed himself into a dictatorial
position and represses all political opposition through his
radical extremist military approach. President Bush created
not just corruption but a classic corruption and placed a
difficult situation on the history of Western countries. He admires
himself, he places all things under a Capitalist mentality where
he feels safe. For example he believes in private health care for
all and he voted not to allow raising tobacco taxes to provide
healthcare for millions of children. To him private healthcare
and a private government approach solves everything, private
interests and a regime toward privatization moved under him
regardless that people in other countries feel offended to
have a Godfather of Capitalism acting on their behalf. Yes,
mafia logic and corruption are tied concepts, particularly
in big governments, radical extremism takes unprecedented
mentalities and with it dictatorial aspects arise, and corruption
brings cultural domination charges and with it crimes against
humanities by a man taking his system and with it his safety
as totalitarian above all other cultures. Safety rules, and
rulership is not democratic. A system turns into corrosion.
Ceausescu sat in his office, wrote, outside in the hall stood
men motionlessly. When a leader of a country embraces in
a system of idealism and his only duties are security related,
he is pretty much a dictator. A system of power as Bush's
hard line Capitalism, as the CCCP, as many others caused the
deaths of millions under brutal hands of power in the 20th
century. These people take relentless leadership in their
system that they intend to tarnish on civilization as standard,
but tarnishing irrealism turns into dictatorial nightmares.
See Texas where now riot police are present in areas in cities
where many people of all ages go out on weekends. As riot police
they cannot speak to the people, carry riot helmets and dressed
in a black uniform. They stand as during protests, though these
people who come to downtown are not protesters. They come to
have fun after a hard week's work, it is a right of all people
to go out on weekends. Brutality emerges in systems that aim
to tarnish other cultures and their own and the place in Austin
Texas reminds of Tianenmen Square where riot police stand in
silence awaiting special orders from the government. And when
such riot police fill the streets, things are about to erupt
in historical changes, where either one side or the other wins,
except there is nothing here to find but workers who come to
have dinner or a drink with collegues or friends or with
family or with a boyfriend or girlfriend, residents.


A totalitarian loss of sense of control, where else than
in the heart of all this racism.


What does this 'heart of this racism' mean?


Radical extremism (constitution, as constitution one finds the old
days of guns and rulers, as that barbarism and not Democracy),
a contra-Communist regime with radical clensing of the streets
and it's territories through political idealism of it's power,
and by all means power, by all means moving forward, by all means
clensing the world if necessary to thrive under a totalitarian
idealism militantly or by any means by the tarnishing display
of threat, of militancy of power that is aims to control the
masses, the politics, the old system regardless of what's reality.
To totalitarianize, to militarize, to display means of fear
on all present and threat citizens, threat global politics,
threat everything by the display of militancy. Yes, in history
like robots, soldiers displayed their image of a system and
country, through movements and success things moved ahead,
and things went more agressive more than on one occasion.
You close your eyes and you see the world, millions praying,
tens of millions of children saluting the American flag each
morning, a closed-mindedness is being fed on all to adhere to
power, not just to respect of a culture and country. Militancies
are taking place around the World. Dalai Lama spoke of this
back in the early 90's. He gave up on speaking on those things
and is now a happy man, but also engages in affairs of Buddhists
in Tibet.


In days of slavery the situation was the same, radicalism controled
power, human rights was not what drove the world but special
interests, and those types of special interests were many, and
protection was asked. Google was around in it's form prostituting
and enslaving humanity in most humiliating ways, slavery of other's
lives online, sponsors of humanitarian assets, 153.75 billion dollars
worth piracy of book libraries, a direct aim toward humanity
in such ways is discrimination as humanity is whored, crippled,
confiscated on, looted, robbed, dissaminated for criminal profit,
and what else comes from the minds of Google than to point cameras
at people's homes through Streetview, to do what fears people to
be caught exiting a strip club in say a small European town. Cameras
on the streets are not something we haven't heard of, though some
are that monsters, and a world of monsters is what this becomes
through blindness to racism being created globally to blindness
to human rights that all people deserve to have respected and
not infringed on by big brother cameras and big brother gestapo
businesses of power, things narrow on old constitutional days,
a place where argument is ran by those in power and not by
Democratic means but through what is classically called today
as corruption and loyalty militarized and not Democratically
positioned through international respect for human rights.
Old constitutional ways and invasions of things that seem
so Democratic by aspects of militancies driven by radical
extremism in the 21st century, and deterioration is incomprehendible.
Osama could have never given rise to so much opposition between the
Arab and the American race as what Bush created, and Bush brought
hate to Europe for which he is looked down on by the mass populus.


Paradoxically to World belief and shock on how corruption is
not seen by American politicians, it is up to the Americans to
"Democratize" their system. Also Saddam could have never achieved
being perceived as a World Dictator in his closed minded radical
extremism. President Bush is a predictable dictator from the
mid-20th century mentality, who ignores all human rights for
a radical Capitalist and unfortunately racially blind monster
of power who directs power itself and not obleging to human
descencies his mother should have taught him. A bully and a
dictator of his system where many are taught to believe and
not question motives of this country.


In days of slavery, the situation was even more blinded in terms
of human rights, up to the 1970's black people by law had to
give seat to white people on the bus or face jail. This country
is corroded in racism and radical extremist foundations to date,
and the Iraq war came in a time of civil rights improvements,
but the decisions brought degradation to the United States
in regards to racist crimes once again dominating the political
atmosphere, similarly to the Nixon era, an administration that
is departed from the people and runs it's own politics over the
World through World War II era ideas, ideas reminding of Stalin,
Hitler, and enemies of the time.


[Once again, since 2002, something Michael Gorbachev pointed out
since the start of the Iraq war:


80-90 percent of Arabs think negatively of Americans as a result of
the Iraq war.


Racism is not allowed politics.


President Bush created more racism than Osama could have ever dreamed
of achieving between Americans and Arabs.


Crimes against humanity, a situation beyond corruption and supremacy.


The United States under president Bush practices what's called a
genuine corruption of power (with or without human rights
considerations here).]


This was the first point of the human rights constitution.
The first point of Democracy is the government belongs to the
people. Here the first point is fair treatment, and not allowing
constitutional powers to gain unfair advantage politically.


It is also human rights not to be mistreated for the benefit of
the rich, and such rights over-rule political rights *on
grounds of mistreatment and corruption*.


Human rights might be thought of in the United States as
matters involving Third World countries, but that is a main
misconception.





Racism escalated, enemies were created, human rights stuff were
horrified, the Iraq war was started out of rage and hate, Saddam
was tied to terrorists, the claims of war were off, wrong, a
situation reminding of a radical extremist USA. In a story, two
men in an American car factory picked up baseball bats and
attacked the first oriental man in sight at the factory when
they lost jobs to Japanese car competitors. The man they killed
was a Chinese immigrant. All they saw was that they had to attack
the first oriental man in sight for loosing jobs to the Japanese
car makers in the American car factory. It was an act of rage and
hate and racism. Bush went after Saddam in ways of indiscrimination
claiming everything on terrorists thus attacking all that was
on the table as interest under that same subject. A country
was taken over for terrorist tie claims. People around the
world felt horrible in what Bush himself called passionate
conservative politics. It's not right, the hate created is not
just in the Arab world but in the entire world against American
politics. European youth bashes Americans and that was not normal in
the past. The natural reaction is that people feel they must think
positively of Americans as people, but there is an unease and a
lot of thinking on having the American military build up
everywhere like crazy in regards to war on terror. There is a
lot of negative sentiment that does not solve friendship and
humanity but provocates and falsely claims and takes, and that
sort of politics separates cultures, and enects a police minded
world (with corruption, and that is scary).

Racism was created at higher levels than what Osama could have ever
dreamed of achiving between Arabs and Americans, and such things are
corruption. Security drives Bush. Ceausescu sat, wrote... when
security places all precedence in a country's politics, he is
pretty much a dictator. Bush takes Capitalism as a religious ground
of totalitarian power, a mentality stemming to World War II times,
and erecting an Iraq as a model counrty for all Arab countries,
a country better than Arabs, is Nazi. Europe has overcome the
past, and this sort of militarism only creates racism and deja-vu
of the past corruptions of power, crimes, as Nancy Pelosi said
when she came to become speaker of the house on November of 2006:
Bush is a dangerous man in denial, a king wearing a naked coat...

Let's move on to the second point of the human rights constition.
There is a natural tendency to not want great powers and systems
to dictate, you know what I mean, repression sucks, nazi mentalities
of systematic powers violate human rights, freedom of thought.
Some things cannot be allowed as super-power mented stalking
leaderships of world power "unprecedented" and so New Direction
needs to be pursuing an initiative against totalitarian practices
that are driven by... a bluebook of a regime. So what shall the
second point be in the human rights constitution? What violates
our human rights most? Corruption of power, repression under a
brainless system that dictates it's system of success on others
mercilessly and dictatorially pervasively dirty and corrupt. Yes,
the great American war propaganda running it's business
uninterrupted since the split of power with the CCCP after
ridding Hitler from power, the event that led to the formation
of two big brother systems with corrupt KGB/CIA governments and
the establishment of the world of elite citizenry amongst it's
us and them society, corruption seen as in the CCCP where only
the elite had special rights above others, in the CCCP only the
top government officials had entry to public swimming pools, the
rest seemed unhealthy and danger to the elite in terms of bringing
germs to the pool. A mentality of benefits to the top class and petty
toward the crowd kept under repression while the big government
ran it's totalitarian warfare uncontrolled and blue book.

The human rights constitution will address corruption of human rights
by unprecedented leaderships of power who are not interested in
Democracy but in their private warfares and sentiment driven
policies of blue book initiatives, (this is too easy.)

Let's just leave it at crimes against humanity for blinded racism
that
brought corruption on all of humanity and international well-being.

Safety cannot compromise racism else it is corruption. In all regards
the Iraq war is racist and inter-culturally criminal.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Human rights constitution
    ... Safety cannot compromise racism, else it is political corruption. ... A system of power as Bush's ... masses, the politics, the old system regardless of what's reality. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Human rights constitution
    ... Safety cannot compromise racism, else it is political corruption. ... These things create human rights violations as profit is ... masses, the politics, the old system regardless of what's reality. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Human rights constitution
    ... Learn the first point of the human rights constitution. ... Safety cannot compromise racism, else it is political corruption. ... A system of power as Bush's ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: The Left have posted polls like crazy!
    ... Radical supremacy stems to the KKK. ... the mob ran police and politics. ... compromized safety with racism, that is corruption, a corruption ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: When The Germans Said "2000 Xronia Parakmis"
    ... The racism you are referring to is a racism based on achievement. ... parakmis" prepei na mas afypnizei, ... Nope, I am not defending *HIM*, I am defending the idea that nobody should ... Likely because corruption is very much ...
    (soc.culture.greek)