Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb <gb6726@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:03:42 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 28, 1:00 am, gb <gb6...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:54 am, gb <gb6...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dark matter is only present because the nature of the Universe is not
Newtonian but relativistic, that exchanges of energy don't take place
directly and mechanistically but through the presence of gentle
pressures acting over distance (such as gravity) (one perceived today
as a force in that regard).
What is a relativistic accelerator? Things act differently under a
relativistic Universe where energy waves exchange forces, and some
forces can be simple tug of war of weight. The presence of a small
pressure can arise which may have unique effects over a spiral galaxy,
the constant presence of this small pressure creates large results in
immensiating dynamics of spiral galaxies. Dark matter is not this
small pressure but the effect of the immensiation of forces that
result. What would be this small pressure, it may arise from the
internal and outer-galactic vortexes. So the small pressure would be a
relativistic accelerator. We seek dark matter in the small pressure
but find only the result and scientists only see the resulting dark
matter present. A small pressure, almost unnoticable arises simply
from relativistic forms of energy exchange, and this force gently
accelerates, would also explain the accelerated expansion of the
Universe.
Typo: This small force gently accelerates, >pressures<..
The unknown constant small pressure force arising from relativistic
exchanges
of energy.
Einstein refered to a Universal constant, but couldn't figure it out.
A small pressure force that ads up over time. And if it keeps on
adding up,
eventually it arrives to the big bang. It is part of the universal
equation. Things
accelerate, expand, and recollapse, and blow.
So correction: Dark matter is not the simplest relativistic
accelerator,
the relativistic nature is, the way energy exchanges in non-
mechanical
forms and as such accumulates and creates accelerating fields upon
accelerating fields, all through the presence of a small pressure
field
of acceleration that effects heat, the CMBR. Sure the Universe expands
but it cools, and when it reaches absolute zero and no more
relativistic
energy exchange possible... Things begin contracting, but other things
alter as well. Without ability to cool the environment and expand
things...
who the *** cares anyway.
Entropy.
The simple universal constant of relativity leads to the big bang.
Accelerated
expansion exchanges heat (CMBR), relativistic properties act as a
weak force of spiral galactic accelerating dynamics, but as a
continuous
weak force it ads up to a lot corresponding to more energy, more mass
in the interplay of gravity.
Theory of the Universe, dark matter, theoretical explanation of the
expansion and eventual collapse of the Universe in terms of
relativistic
dynamics creating a small accelerating pressure field, how and what
this small pressure field is is not clearly explained. It sits,
transforms
heat into motion, cools space, the post big bang heat. The theory
brings an eternal collapse/big bang model where heat drives
accelerated expansion and relativistic properties somehow
create a mystic small pressure field that over time accumulates
and acts over the dynamics of spiral galaxies and over expanding
all things simply because nature rides on relativistic and not
Newtonian mechanistic properties. Now the math... is not my
territory. I am a brain person. I see, therefore I understand.
The only reason to explain the great void is that temperatures
there already dropped to absolute zero. There is no CMBR there,
is there? All matter gets patched away back toward the big bang
eventually. Gravity there is not expanding everywhere any more..
So the only task left is to define the small pressure force of
relativity
or the Universal Constant.
Thus: What converts is the Universal Constant of relativity as some
sort of a small pressure constant that accelerates things until
there is CMBR and or other local heat. All things expand in an
accelerated form because of the Universal Constant of relativistic
nature, but when heat runs out, the expansion halts and the region
turns repulsive in terms of gravity. This is a possibility for
experiments,
such as cooling space to absolute zero might introduce anti-
gravitational
properties. This also means that heating space induces gravitational
properties or fields. Expansion is driven by the conversion of CMBR,
cosmic heat into and from cosmic pressure of the Universal Constant.
We speak of cosmic pressure and heat and find an atmosphere
type condition, expansion leads to cooling of the cosmic space,
but heat leads to accelerated particles. Dark matter and CMBR
has no known connection, but I described dark matter as merely
a natural condition of an accelerated aspects where the acceleration
was driven by the cosmic pressure (of expansion, where if things
don't expand then they speed up and magnify in force). The small
force of cosmic pressure (Universal Constant) lays in the relativistic
side of energy transfer. This means that energy is exchanged through
fields rather than mechanistically and these fields are alive, create
an active zone, but the moment CMBR drops to absolute zero,
the Universe cannot expand gravitationally, cannot accelerate
and expand and drive cosmic pressure toward infinity.
So expansion of the Universe is a process and it fuels spiral
galaxies to carry immensities in energy and mass beyond their
visible mass. Scientists blame dark matter for the expansion
but it is a result of the cosmic pressure, of the Universal Constant.
All these theories arose, because I wanted to derive perpetual motion
from dark mater, from the same kind of virtual working mechanism.
Arrived to the knowledge of everything, while some say math helps
instead.
I am, me. Yes, there is a possibility through high atomic physics
to create a perpetual motion machine.
I spoke of the Universal Constant as a pressure, but it's an added
weight,
an accelerating force, a force that I concluded is present because
nature
is relativistic. Einstein pondered on it, why he called it his
blatancy, is
because he didn't know. That's what blatancy is. He couldn't figure
it out, he was dumb. Added weight converts with accelerating force.
It's very simple. But to him it was like top science. He didn't know
anything about dark matter. It was just all in the dark. He didn't
know
anything about the great void. What did he know about cosmic heat
and the big bang in the early-mid 20th century? He had no clue, he
was clueless and turned it a war of the worlds situation sitting on
this
1/3rd picture of the Universal Constant being a relevant thing, but
no complete theory could be wrapped around it.
But I am sitting on my perpetual motion machine idea which will bring
anti-gravity, human superman, free energy, flying 1st class hotels
with
windows to the stars.
What happens when a great void grows around a large chunk of trapped
mass?
Yes, don't want to travel to the center of the great void.
.
- References:
- Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- From: gb
- Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- Prev by Date: Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- Next by Date: Re: Question about the formation of the earth and its elements
- Previous by thread: Re: Dark matter is the simplest relativistic accelerator?
- Next by thread: Re: Weather And Latitude Are Not Allies
- Index(es):