Re: Pioneer Anomaly discussion continued
- From: Thomas Smid <thomas.smid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
On 10 Mar, 15:56, Thomas Smid <thomas.s...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the same sense as for instance
the observed Pioneer acceleration should not qualify as a legitimate
indicator of the sun's gravitational field to an accuracy better than
10^-7 as long as it is not fully theoretically modelled).
that should have been 'the sun's gravitational acceleration to an
accuracy better than 10^-7 cm/sec^2 '.
Thomas
.
- References:
- Pioneer Anomaly discussion continued
- From: Thomas Smid
- Re: Pioneer Anomaly discussion continued
- From: Craig Markwardt
- Re: Pioneer Anomaly discussion continued
- From: Thomas Smid
- Pioneer Anomaly discussion continued
- Prev by Date: kelis nude photos,pictures of adult nude threesome
- Next by Date: Re: Pioneer Anomaly discussion continued
- Previous by thread: Re: Pioneer Anomaly discussion continued
- Next by thread: Re: Pioneer Anomaly discussion continued
- Index(es):