Re: Convection inside a star
- From: Crown-Horned Snorkack <chornedsnorkack@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
On 25 apr, 00:53, will...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Steve Willner) wrote:
In article <b80f3645-6a91-493f-87ae-bf685885f...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Precisely how does "degenerate" matter differ from non-"degenerate"
Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Degeneracy pressure, right?
Perhaps you are thinking of the stability of the entire star.
Degenerate cores are stable if their mass is below the "Chandrasekhar
limit" (about 1.4 solar masses) and unstable if more massive than
that. Stars supported entirely by radiation pressure (as very hot,
massive stars are) are also unstable.
Convective stability is a question of how energy is transferred in
each layer.
For a star to be convective all the way down, I believe it must
have a source of support other than ideal gas pressure or it would
be unstable.
Nope. Red dwarfs are non-degenerate all the way down as long as
nuclear burning continues. So are massive stars burning hydrogen via
the carbon cycle.
liquid or solid?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Convection inside a star
- From: Steve Willner
- Re: Convection inside a star
- References:
- Convection inside a star
- From: Yousuf Khan
- Re: Convection inside a star
- From: Steve Willner
- Re: Convection inside a star
- From: Crown-Horned Snorkack
- Re: Convection inside a star
- From: Steve Willner
- Re: Convection inside a star
- From: Andrew Usher
- Re: Convection inside a star
- From: Steve Willner
- Convection inside a star
- Prev by Date: How Michel Nostradamus stopped the Randi-Dawkins Corp.....
- Next by Date: Refining the date of dinosaur extinction (Forwarded)
- Previous by thread: Re: Convection inside a star
- Next by thread: Re: Convection inside a star
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|