Nearby stars-why do they start at 4LY?
- From: John C. Polasek <jpolasek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:00:05 -0400
Wiki et al show tables of the first 20 or 50 starsnearest the earth.
The distances for the first few are
... .. .. 4.3 6.0 7.7 8.4 8.6 9.4 10.4 LY
1.7 1.7 .7 .2 1.2 1 the differences
Why are there no stars from 0 to 4.3 LY? From the difference list
there should be at least 2 closer than 4.3.
These are probably the few that can be measured using the parallactic
effect. It just doesn't seem likely that such a void exists.
John Polasek
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nearby stars-why do they start at 4LY?
- From: Mike Dworetsky
- Re: Nearby stars-why do they start at 4LY?
- From: Craig Markwardt
- Re: Nearby stars-why do they start at 4LY?
- From: Androcles
- Re: Nearby stars-why do they start at 4LY?
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: Nearby stars-why do they start at 4LY?
- Prev by Date: Re: ILE - The Ideal Lane-Emden Equation
- Next by Date: Re: Lin Liangtai - why not peer reviewed publication
- Previous by thread: Why can't NASA turn a few more rocks on Mars to see if they are fossils or not?
- Next by thread: Re: Nearby stars-why do they start at 4LY?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|