Re: Lin Liangtai - why not peer reviewed publication
- From: John C. Polasek <jpolasek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:02:56 -0400
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:51:32 -0700 (PDT), ukastronomy
<martin_piers_nicholson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Instead of endlessly pumping out the same material to people in this
group who don't seem interested or convinced by what you write why not
just prepare an article for peer reviewed publication.
If the evidence is as overwhelming as you would have us believe the
well known scientific journals would jump at the opportunity to
publish your work.
Martin Nicholson
Daventry, England
Don't be naive. Jumping would be their last choice.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lin Liangtai - why not peer reviewed publication
- From: caspar . milquetoast123
- Re: Lin Liangtai - why not peer reviewed publication
- References:
- NASA is trapped by evolution and vested interest in the face of mounting evidence for fossils on Mars
- From: Lin Liangtai
- Lin Liangtai - why not peer reviewed publication
- From: ukastronomy
- NASA is trapped by evolution and vested interest in the face of mounting evidence for fossils on Mars
- Prev by Date: Nearby stars-why do they start at 4LY?
- Next by Date: Re: Nearby stars-why do they start at 4LY?
- Previous by thread: Lin Liangtai - why not peer reviewed publication
- Next by thread: Re: Lin Liangtai - why not peer reviewed publication
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading