Re: Understanding Dark Energy and the Environmental Impact
- From: "Peter Webb" <webbfamily@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:21:41 +1100
"bkh99" <btb1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5ba86b22-cc5e-4ac6-b1a0-85e7e3a1118b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Because the development of a new energy technology has now become
inevitable, and will happen, it is important that it be discussed and
properly understood, and that people are made aware of changes to
come.
The previous discussion and a description of this technology can be
found here :
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics.new-theories/browse_thread/thread/6a949cd89917f8d9#
or here
http://www.awitness.org/unified/pages/dark_energy.html
The following discussion is intended to clarify a few points
concerning a previous discussion on the topic of harnessing the so-
called ‘dark energy' of the universe as a new form of energy. The
discussion included a schematic block diagram of a device employed to
accomplish this task, and for this reason it is now inevitable that
this technology will be deployed. It is only a matter of time, some
research and the development of a practical application.
The purpose of this ‘thought experiment' was to demonstrate that the
Unified Field Theory is correct. Another way to accomplish the same
thing would involve releasing a balloon filled with hydrogen gas on
the moon, and since the moon has no atmosphere it becomes obvious that
hydrogen or helium filled balloons do not rise because ‘they are
lighter than air'. The real question to ask is ‘why is hydrogen
lighter than air?' Why does the gravitational field attempt to sort
atoms and molecules based upon their density? The interpretation of
gravitation as some kind of ‘matter based field', and thus impossible
to unify, would all go up in smoke in the one minute it took some
hydrogen or helium balloon to rise up from the surface of the moon.
Unfortunately we have no moon base right now so we must come up with
ideas for experiments that can be conducted down here on earth working
with what we have where we are right now.
****************
Sure. Stick a helium balloon in a vacuum chamber and see if it rises or falls.
If it rises, then you have your proof, and can expect a call from Stockholm to receive your Nobel prize in physics.
If it falls, then your theory has failed, and you can stop posting your crap.
If you want to put serious money on it, depending on where you are I can arrange access to a vacuum chamber and we can see for ourselves. That way, you win money as well as finally being proved right.
So how about it?
.
- Prev by Date: Re: How Does Light Reach It's Speed?
- Next by Date: Re: How Does Light Reach It's Speed?
- Previous by thread: The Universe's oldest planet (so far)
- Next by thread: Re: Understanding Dark Energy and the Environmental Impact
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
