Re: A new equivalence principle
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dlzc1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:12:44 -0700
Dear Jean:
"Jean" <Polaris.2002@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:115b28b3-b366-46a4-8028-b3351462033c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 19 août, 18:45, dlzc <dl...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_analysisHere is what you are trying to reinvent:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckingham_%CF%80_theorem
The Buckingham's theorem is relatively recent in
sciences' history.
And you will ignore it, and proceed on with your white cane with
red tip, seeking to write 1000 words, about a topic that was
sufficiently covered by Sir Isaac Newton and/or Johannes Kepler
for this need.
The "entire" world, posterity, and your future employers do not
need to know about your exposition.
David A. Smith
.
- References:
- A new equivalence principle
- From: Jean
- Re: A new equivalence principle
- From: dlzc
- Re: A new equivalence principle
- From: Jean
- A new equivalence principle
- Prev by Date: >>>> WESTERN GAMES <<<<
- Next by Date: Re: Which diameter of the sun in digital photos ?
- Previous by thread: Re: A new equivalence principle
- Next by thread: Re: A new equivalence principle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|