Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt
From: John Edser (edser_at_tpg.com.au)
Date: 06/23/04
- Next message: Peter Webb: "Re: Physical fitness and evolution"
- Previous message: RobertMaas_at_YahooGroups.Com: "Re: Analog vs Digital"
- Next in thread: Anon.: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Reply: Anon.: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Maybe reply: John Edser: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:06:36 +0000 (UTC)
> JE:-
> "Wierd"? Dr O'Hara is not correct.
> The HW distribution is just a binomial
> distribution derived from Pascale's
> Triangle.
BOH:-
Sorry, John, but there's simply no such thing as the "HW distribution"
in the Hardy-Weinberg law. If I'm wrong, then please correct me by
pointing to the literature which places the "HW distribution" in the H-W
law.
JE:-
Pedantic nonsense.
Do you deny or confirm that HW “law”
only represents a binomial _distribution_
of the alleles concerned so the HW “law”
is actually just a binomial distribution
of alleles, i.e. HW “law” only represents
a defined _zero_ state re: any _significant_
bias of a binomial distribution of the
alleles concerned?
John Edser
Independent Researcher
PO Box 266
Church Pt
NSW 2105
Australia
edser@tpg.com.au
- Next message: Peter Webb: "Re: Physical fitness and evolution"
- Previous message: RobertMaas_at_YahooGroups.Com: "Re: Analog vs Digital"
- Next in thread: Anon.: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Reply: Anon.: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Maybe reply: John Edser: "Re: Hardy-Weinberg lawt"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|