Re: Initialling Quoted Texts
From: John Edser (edser_at_tpg.com.au)
Date: 06/26/04
- Next message: John Edser: "Re: Initialling Quoted Texts"
- Previous message: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Analog vs Digital"
- Maybe in reply to: John Edser: "Initialling Quoted Texts"
- Next in thread: Name And Address Supplied: "Re: Initialling Quoted Texts"
- Reply: Name And Address Supplied: "Re: Initialling Quoted Texts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:20:03 +0000 (UTC)
NAS:-
But somehow you still managed to do just that, as we saw.
And even if such mistakes were vanishingly rare, ..
JE:-
The logic is _very_ simple. If quoted blocks of text
are correctly initialised from the very _start_,
which was _not_ the case here, as our moderator has
recommended (perhaps Josh may wish to confirm such),
then it is almost impossible to mistake authorship.
NAS:-
...there are other
problems. For instance, reading your posts I often get confused as to
who said what *when*.
t's often difficult to see what is reply and
what has gone before.
JE:-
This is the way return sbe _emails_,
format using Outlook. I can see no way
to correct it. However it makes little
difference if the dialog has been
correctly initialised.
NAS:-
Let me illustrate . . .
Ahem. John, would I be wrong to suggest that your contributions to
this newsgroup are entirely worthless?
JE:-
Your hostility remains, palpable.
Regards,
John Edser
Independent Researcher
PO Box 266
Church Pt
NSW 2105
Australia
edser@tpg.com.au
- Next message: John Edser: "Re: Initialling Quoted Texts"
- Previous message: Perplexed in Peoria: "Re: Analog vs Digital"
- Maybe in reply to: John Edser: "Initialling Quoted Texts"
- Next in thread: Name And Address Supplied: "Re: Initialling Quoted Texts"
- Reply: Name And Address Supplied: "Re: Initialling Quoted Texts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|